Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1987;66(1):99-105.
doi: 10.1007/BF00236206.

The role of Renshaw cells in locomotion: antagonism of their excitation from motor axon collaterals with intravenous mecamylamine

The role of Renshaw cells in locomotion: antagonism of their excitation from motor axon collaterals with intravenous mecamylamine

B R Noga et al. Exp Brain Res. 1987.

Abstract

The contribution of Renshaw cell (RC) activity to the production of fictive locomotion in the mesencephalic preparation was examined using the nicotinic antagonist mecamylamine (MEC). After the i.v. administration of 3 doses of MEC (1.0 mg/kg) the following observations were made: 1) ventral root (VR) evoked discharge of RCs was decreased by up to 87.7%, 2) recurrent inhibitory postsynaptic potentials recorded in alpha motoneurons were greatly reduced or abolished, and 3) the rhythmic firing of RCs during the fictive step cycle was abolished in 83% of the cells examined. Locomotor drive potentials (LDPs) in motoneurons persisted during the fictive step cycle after MEC administration. Bursts of motoneuron firing during each fictive step cycle were characterized by increased frequency and number of spikes after MEC, although the burst duration was unaltered for similar step cycle lengths. A greater number and frequency of spikes per burst was also observed in Ia inhibitory interneurons (IaINs), which remained rhythmically active after MEC administration. It is concluded that Renshaw cells are not an integral part of the spinal central pattern generator for locomotion, nor do they control the timing of the motoneuron or IaIN bursts of firing during fictive locomotion. The data are consistent with a role for RCs in limiting the firing rates of motoneurons and IaINs during each burst.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Neurophysiol. 1960 Mar;23:144-53 - PubMed
    1. J Physiol. 1971 Jul;215(3):613-36 - PubMed
    1. J Neurophysiol. 1980 Sep;44(3):489-500 - PubMed
    1. Exp Brain Res. 1966;2(1):49-65 - PubMed
    1. Brain Res. 1975 Feb 7;84(2):181-94 - PubMed

Publication types