Economic costs and health utility values associated with extremely preterm birth: Evidence from the EPICure2 cohort study
- PMID: 35830294
- PMCID: PMC9543967
- DOI: 10.1111/ppe.12906
Economic costs and health utility values associated with extremely preterm birth: Evidence from the EPICure2 cohort study
Abstract
Background: Preterm birth is associated with adverse health and developmental sequelae that impose a burden on finite resources and significant challenges for individuals, families and societies.
Objectives: To estimate economic outcomes at age 11 associated with extremely preterm birth using evidence from a whole population study (EPICure2 study).
Methods: The study population comprised a sample of children born at ≤26 completed weeks of gestation during 2006 in England (n = 200) and a comparison group of classmates born at term (n = 143). Societal costs were estimated using parent and teacher reports of service utilisation, and valuations of work losses and additional care costs to families. Utility scores for the Health Utilities Index Mark 2 (HUI2) and Mark 3 (HUI3) were generated using UK and Canadian value sets. Generalised linear regression was used to estimate the impact of extremely preterm birth on societal costs and utility scores.
Results: Unadjusted mean societal costs that excluded provision of special educational support in mainstream schools during the 11th year after birth were £6536 for the extremely preterm group and £3275 for their classmates, generating a difference of £3262 (95% confidence interval [CI] £1912, £5543). The mean adjusted cost difference was £2916 (95% CI £1609, £4224), including special educational needs provision in mainstream schools increased the adjusted cost difference to £4772 (95% CI £3166, £6378). Compared with birth at term, extremely preterm birth generated mean-adjusted utility decrements ranging from 0.13 (95% CI 0.09, 0.18) based on the UK HUI2 statistical inference tariff to 0.28 (95% CI 0.18, 0.37) based on the Canadian HUI3 tariff.
Conclusions: The adverse economic impact of extremely preterm birth persists into late childhood. Further longitudinal studies conducted from multiple perspectives are needed to understand the magnitude, trajectory and underpinning mechanisms of economic outcomes following extremely preterm birth.
Keywords: costs; economic; extremely preterm; health utilities.
© 2022 The Authors. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
SP receives support as a NIHR Senior Investigator (NF‐SI‐0616‐10103) and from the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Oxford and Thames Valley. The views contained within this paper are those of the authors and not necessarily of the funders. NM declares Consulting fees with Novartis outside the published work and receives part funding from the Department of Health’s National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre’s funding scheme at UCLH/UCL. All other authors have no conflict of interest to report.
References
-
- Petrou S, Khan K. Economic costs associated with moderate and late preterm birth: primary and secondary evidence. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;17(3):170‐178. - PubMed
-
- Walani SR. Global burden of preterm birth. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2020;150(1):31‐33. - PubMed
-
- WHO . In: Howson C, Kinney M, Lawn JE, eds. Born too soon: the global action report on preterm birth. World health organization; 2012. 2012.
-
- Office for National Statistics (ONS) . Birth characteristics in England and Wales: 2019. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarri.... Accessed Septembet 09, 2021, 2020.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources