Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May;13(3):681-691.
doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1751092. Epub 2022 Jul 13.

Providers Electing to Receive Electronic Result Notifications: Demographics and Motivation

Benjamin H Slovis  1   2 , William J K Vervilles  3 , David K Vawdrey  4 , Jordan L Swartz  5 , Catherine Winans  6 , John C Kairys  2   7 , Jeffrey M Riggio  2   8
Affiliations

Providers Electing to Receive Electronic Result Notifications: Demographics and Motivation

Benjamin H Slovis et al. Appl Clin Inform. 2022 May.

Abstract

Background: Automated electronic result notifications can alert health care providers of important clinical results. In contrast to historical notification systems, which were predominantly focused on critical laboratory abnormalities and often not very customizable, modern electronic health records provide capabilities for subscription-based electronic notification. This capability has not been well studied.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to develop an understanding of when and how a provider decides to use a subscription-based electronic notification. Better appreciation for the factors that contribute to selecting such notifications could aid in improving the functionality of these tools.

Methods: We performed an 8-month quantitative assessment of 3,291 notifications and a qualitative survey assessment of 73 providers who utilized an elective notification tool in our electronic health record.

Results: We found that most notifications were requested by attending physicians (∼60%) and from internal medicine specialty (∼25%). Most providers requested only a few notifications while a small minority (nearly 5%) requested 10 or more in the study period. The majority (nearly 30%) of requests were for chemistry laboratories. Survey respondents reported using the tool predominantly for important or time-sensitive laboratories. Overall opinions of the tool were positive (median = 7 out of 10, 95% confidence interval: 6-9), with 40% of eligible respondents reporting the tool improved quality of care. Reported examples included time to result review, monitoring of heparin drips, and reviewing pathology results.

Conclusion: Developing an understanding for when and how providers decide to be notified of clinical results can help aid in the design and improvement of clinical tools, such as improved elective notifications. These tools may lead to reduced time to result review which could in turn improve clinical care quality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Breakdown of the number of providers based on provider type for each specialty where that specialty ordered more than five notifications in the study period.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Boxplots of the frequency of the daily notifications in each week.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Henry J, Pylypchuk Y, Searcy T. Adoption of electronic health record systems among US non-federal acute care hospitals: 2008–2015. ONC Data Brief. 2016;35:1–9.
    1. Salmasian H, Landman A B, Morris C. An electronic notification system for improving patient flow in the emergency department. AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2019;2019:242–247. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mamykina L, Vawdrey D K, Hripcsak G. How do residents spend their shift time? A time and motion study with a particular focus on the use of computers. Acad Med. 2016;91(06):827–832. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sinsky C, Colligan L, Li L. Allocation of physician time in ambulatory practice: a time and motion study in 4 specialties. Ann Intern Med. 2016;165(11):753–760. - PubMed
    1. Slovis B H, Nahass T A, Salmasian H, Kuperman G, Vawdrey D K. Asynchronous automated electronic laboratory result notifications: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017;24(06):1173–1183. - PMC - PubMed