Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 13;12(1):11863.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-15920-1.

AI-based automatic segmentation of craniomaxillofacial anatomy from CBCT scans for automatic detection of pharyngeal airway evaluations in OSA patients

Affiliations

AI-based automatic segmentation of craniomaxillofacial anatomy from CBCT scans for automatic detection of pharyngeal airway evaluations in OSA patients

Kaan Orhan et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

This study aims to generate and also validate an automatic detection algorithm for pharyngeal airway on CBCT data using an AI software (Diagnocat) which will procure a measurement method. The second aim is to validate the newly developed artificial intelligence system in comparison to commercially available software for 3D CBCT evaluation. A Convolutional Neural Network-based machine learning algorithm was used for the segmentation of the pharyngeal airways in OSA and non-OSA patients. Radiologists used semi-automatic software to manually determine the airway and their measurements were compared with the AI. OSA patients were classified as minimal, mild, moderate, and severe groups, and the mean airway volumes of the groups were compared. The narrowest points of the airway (mm), the field of the airway (mm2), and volume of the airway (cc) of both OSA and non-OSA patients were also compared. There was no statistically significant difference between the manual technique and Diagnocat measurements in all groups (p > 0.05). Inter-class correlation coefficients were 0.954 for manual and automatic segmentation, 0.956 for Diagnocat and automatic segmentation, 0.972 for Diagnocat and manual segmentation. Although there was no statistically significant difference in total airway volume measurements between the manual measurements, automatic measurements, and DC measurements in non-OSA and OSA patients, we evaluated the output images to understand why the mean value for the total airway was higher in DC measurement. It was seen that the DC algorithm also measures the epiglottis volume and the posterior nasal aperture volume due to the low soft-tissue contrast in CBCT images and that leads to higher values in airway volume measurement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Financial support was received by Diagnocat Co. Ltd., San Francisco CA. Matvey Ezhov, Maxim Gusarev, Alexander Plaksin, Mamat Shamshiev, Maria Golitsyna, Eugene Shumilov, and Alex Sanders are employees of Diagnocat Co. Ltd. Kaan Orhan is a scientific research advisor for the Diagnocat Co. Ltd., Aida Kurbanova, Melis Misirli, Gürkan Ünsal, Secil Aksoy, Finn Rasmussen have no potential competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Inference algorithm of our study.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dempsey JA, Veasey SC, Morgan BJ, O'Donnell CP. Pathophysiology of sleep apnea. Physiol. Rev. 2010;90:47–112. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00043.2008. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Salles C, Terse-Ramos R, Souza-Machado A, Cruz AA. Obstructive sleep apnea and asthma. J. Bras. Pneumol. 2013;39:604–612. doi: 10.1590/S1806-37132013000500011. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ogna A, et al. Obstructive sleep apnea severity and overnight body fluid shift before and after hemodialysis. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2015;10:1002–1010. doi: 10.2215/CJN.08760914. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Drakatos P, et al. Computed tomography cephalometric and upper airway measurements in patients with OSA and erectile dysfunction. Sleep Breath. 2016;20:769–776. doi: 10.1007/s11325-015-1297-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hudgel DW. Mechanisms of obstructive sleep apnea. Chest. 1992;101:541–549. doi: 10.1378/chest.101.2.541. - DOI - PubMed