Urologists are optimistic surgeons: prevalence and predictors of discordance between intraoperative stone-free rate and cross-sectional imaging evaluation after vacuum-assisted mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy
- PMID: 35831471
- PMCID: PMC9427905
- DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-04091-3
Urologists are optimistic surgeons: prevalence and predictors of discordance between intraoperative stone-free rate and cross-sectional imaging evaluation after vacuum-assisted mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy
Abstract
Purpose: To assess how accurate are urologists in predicting stone-free status (SFS) after vacuum-assisted mini-PCNL (vamPCNL) compared to computed tomography (CT) and clinical predictors of discordant SFS.
Methods: Data from 235 patients who underwent vamPCNL were analysed. Patient's demographics, stones' characteristics and operative data were recorded. SFS was evaluated intraoperatively by the treating urologist (iSFS) and with non-contrast CT 3 months after vamPCNL (ctSFS). SFS was defined as no residual stones. Stone complexity was scored with the Guy's score. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression models were used to identify clinical factors associated with discordant SFS (namely iSFS not confirmed at CT).
Results: iSFS and ctSFS were 88.5% and 65.5%, respectively, with 54 (23%) cases resulting in discordant evaluation of SFS between the surgeon and CT imaging. Patients with discordant SFS had larger stone volume (p < 0.001), higher rate of multiple stones (p = 0.03) and higher rate of multiple calyceal groups affected by stones (p < 0.001) than those with concordant SFS. The use of flexible ureteroscopes to look for residual stones after lithotripsy was more frequently reported in cases with concordant SFS (p = 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that stones in > 2 calyceal groups (OR 10.2, p < 0.001), Guy's score II (OR 5.8, p < 0.01) and not using flexible ureteroscopes after lithotripsy (OR 2.9, p = 0.02) were independent predictors of discordant SFS.
Conclusion: One out of five patients is erroneously considered SF after vamPCNL. Urologist should carefully evaluate patients with multiple calyceal stones and consider using flexible ureteroscopes to complete lapaxy of migrated fragments in order to improve their prediction of SFS.
Keywords: Intraoperative evaluation; Percutaneous nephrolithotomy; Stone-free rate; Vacuum-assisted percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
None.
Similar articles
-
Vacuum-assisted mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy is associated with lower rates of infectious complications compared to vacuum-cleaner procedure in patients at high risk for infections: a single-center experience.World J Urol. 2024 Mar 27;42(1):200. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04897-3. World J Urol. 2024. PMID: 38536503 Free PMC article.
-
Miniaturized Ambulatory Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Flexible Ureteroscopy in the Management of Lower Calyceal Renal Stones 10-20 mm: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.Urology. 2021 Oct;156:65-70. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.05.041. Epub 2021 Jun 17. Urology. 2021. PMID: 34097943
-
Cone Beam Computed Tomography-Assisted Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in a Hybrid Operating Room: Optimization of Patient Selection.J Endourol. 2024 May;38(5):432-437. doi: 10.1089/end.2023.0437. Epub 2024 Apr 2. J Endourol. 2024. PMID: 38420888
-
Stone Localization Is Pivotal for the Success of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.Urol Int. 2021;105(7-8):574-580. doi: 10.1159/000513188. Epub 2021 Feb 15. Urol Int. 2021. PMID: 33588413
-
Endourologic Management (PCNL, URS, SWL) of Stones in Solitary Kidney: A Systematic Review from European Association of Urologists Young Academic Urologists and Uro-Technology Groups.J Endourol. 2020 Jan;34(1):7-17. doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0455. Epub 2019 Sep 26. J Endourol. 2020. PMID: 31456421
Cited by
-
Validation of the Trifecta Scoring Metric in Vacuum-Assisted Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Single-Center Experience.J Clin Med. 2022 Nov 16;11(22):6788. doi: 10.3390/jcm11226788. J Clin Med. 2022. PMID: 36431265 Free PMC article.
-
Vacuum-assisted mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy is associated with lower rates of infectious complications compared to vacuum-cleaner procedure in patients at high risk for infections: a single-center experience.World J Urol. 2024 Mar 27;42(1):200. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04897-3. World J Urol. 2024. PMID: 38536503 Free PMC article.
-
Does intraoperative surgeon reported stone free status (IO-SFS) correlate with CT based post operative stone free status (PO-SFS) in flexible ureteroscopy using flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS) in real-world practice? A prospective global FANS collaborative study group initiative with the section of EAU endourology.World J Urol. 2025 Mar 21;43(1):184. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05570-z. World J Urol. 2025. PMID: 40119185
-
Vacuum-assisted mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy is associated with lower rates of infectious complications compared to standard procedures in low-risk patients: a single-center experience.World J Urol. 2025 Jul 25;43(1):457. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05783-2. World J Urol. 2025. PMID: 40711573
-
The role of endoscopic evaluation of stone-free status at the end of retrograde intrarenal surgery. Should we trust ourselves? Prospective data over 5 years from a referral stone centre.World J Urol. 2025 Jul 10;43(1):425. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05770-7. World J Urol. 2025. PMID: 40640474
References
-
- Türk C, Neisius A, Petřík A, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Somani B, Thomas K, Gambaro G, Davis NF, Donaldson JF, Lombardo R, Tzelves L. EAU Guidelines on Urolithiasis. Available at: https://uroweb.org/wp-content/uploads/EAU-Guidelines-on-Urolithiasis-202.... Accessed Febrauary 18th, 2022. n.d.
-
- Chung DY, Kang DH, Cho KS, Jeong WS, Jung HD, Kwon JK, et al. Comparison of stone-free rates following shock wave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of renal stones: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0211316. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211316. - DOI - PMC - PubMed