Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul 29;30(2):87-93.
doi: 10.4103/JMU.JMU_10_21. eCollection 2022 Apr-Jun.

Evaluation of Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Imaging in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Cervical Lymphadenopathy

Affiliations

Evaluation of Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Imaging in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Cervical Lymphadenopathy

Kamat Rohan et al. J Med Ultrasound. .

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic role of acoustic radiation force impulse imaging (ARFI) in differentiating benign and malignant cervical nodes.

Methods: This was a diagnostic accuracy cross-sectional study. All patients who underwent ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of cervical nodes were included. Patients without FNAC/biopsy and patients in whom cervical nodes were cystic or completely necrotic were excluded. FNAC was used as reference investigation to predict the diagnostic accuracy. In all cases, FNAC was carried out after the B-mode, color Doppler and the ARFI imaging. In patients with multiple cervical lymph nodes, the most suspicious node based on grayscale findings was chosen for ARFI. ARFI included Virtual Touch imaging (VTI), area ratio (AR), and shear wave velocity (SWV) for each node, and the results were compared with FNAC/biopsy.

Results: The final analysis included 166 patients. Dark VTI elastograms had sensitivity and specificity of 86.2% and 72.1%, respectively, in identifying malignant nodes. Sensitivity and specificity of AR were 71.3% and 82.3%, respectively, for a cutoff of 1.155. Median SWV of benign and malignant nodes was 1.9 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.56-2.55] m/s and 6.7 (95% CI, 2.87-9.10) m/s, respectively. SWV >2.68 m/s helped in identifying malignant nodes with 81% specificity, 81.6% sensitivity, and 81.3% accuracy. ARFI was found to be inaccurate in tuberculous and lymphomatous nodes.

Conclusion: Malignant nodes had significantly darker elastograms, higher AR and SWV compared to benign nodes, and SWV was the most accurate parameter. ARFI accurately identifies malignant nodes, hence could potentially avoid unwarranted biopsy.

Keywords: Acoustic radiation force impulse; Virtual Touch imaging; acoustic radiation force impulse imaging; area ratio; cervical lymph nodes; shear wave velocity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A 50-year-old woman with a metastatic papillary thyroid carcinoma of a cervical lymph node. (a) Grayscale ultrasound image (b) Predominantly dark elastogram on Virtual Touch imaging. (c) Area ratio – 1.3 (d) Shear wave velocity – 4.65 m/s (obtained from another cervical lymph node from the same patient)
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) Receiver operator characteristic curves-median area ratio (area under the curve – 0.842) (b) receiver operator characteristic curves-median shear wave velocity (area under the curve – 0.856)
Figure 3
Figure 3
A 22-year-old woman with a reactive cervical lymph node (a) Grayscale ultrasound image (b) Predominantly bright elastogram on Virtual Touch imaging (c) Area ratio – 0.90 (d) Shear wave velocity – 1.57 m/s (obtained from another cervical lymph node from the same patient)
Figure 4
Figure 4
A 49-year-old man with a tuberculosis cervical lymph node. This heterogeneous cervical lymph node showed a high shear wave velocity of 4.37 m/s
Figure 5
Figure 5
A 57-year-old woman with a metastatic adenocarcinoma of the cervical lymph node from a breast cancer. This ill-defined hypoechoic lymph node showed a shear wave velocity of X.XX. This was considered as 9.1 m/s based on the manufacturer recommendations

References

    1. Ahuja AT, Ying M. Sonographic evaluation of cervical lymph nodes. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184:1691–9. - PubMed
    1. Teng DK, Wang H, Lin YQ, Sui GQ, Guo F, Sun LN. Value of ultrasound elastography in assessment of enlarged cervical lymph nodes. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13:2081–5. - PubMed
    1. Lyshchik A, Higashi T, Asato R, Tanaka S, Ito J, Hiraoka M, et al. Cervical lymph node metastases: Diagnosis at sonoelastography – Initial experience 1. Radiology. 2007;243:258–67. - PubMed
    1. Shozushima M, Suzuki M, Nakasima T, Yanagisawa Y, Sakamaki K, Takeda Y. Ultrasound diagnosis of lymph node metastasis in head and neck cancer. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1990;19:165–70. - PubMed
    1. Ahuja AT, Ying M, Ho SY, Antonio G, Lee YP, King AD, et al. Ultrasound of malignant cervical lymph nodes. Cancer Imaging. 2008;8:48–56. - PMC - PubMed