Specific Design of a Press Fit Humeral Stem Provides low Stress Shielding in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty at minimum 5 Years FU
- PMID: 35832511
- PMCID: PMC9272197
- DOI: 10.1177/24715492221112543
Specific Design of a Press Fit Humeral Stem Provides low Stress Shielding in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty at minimum 5 Years FU
Abstract
Press fit fixation is becoming more popular in RSA to preserve, in theory, bone capital. Several studies report that bone resorption can be very high around humeral stems depending on their size, shape and mode of fixation. The aim of the current study is to mid-term follow-up clinical and radiological result of a press fit ovoid regular stem RSA in non acute trauma cases.
Materials and methods: We performed a retrospective monocentric study of patients continuously implanted with the Humeris® stem RSA for degenerative change of the shoulder. Nineteen shoulders, in eighteen patients (74.6 y.o (from 69 to 81)), were available at minimum five years follow-up.
Results: The mean final adjusted Constant score was 111.9 (65 to 130), and the mean ASES score was 49.82 (10 to 60). Humeral resorption was observed in 21% of cases. We found a statistically significant (p = .014) lower adjusted Constant score in patients presenting with resorption on post-operative X-rays compared to those without resorption (115.6 vs. 98.25). Half cases of patients presenting a resorption underwent L'Episcopo procedure during surgery. Humeral resorption occurs the first year after surgery and do not increase even 8 years after surgery. Analysis demonstrated no correlation between the value of filling ratios and bone resorption.
Conclusion: The current study confirms a low rate of stress shielding around the studied stem, with rare bony resorption and no osteopenia around the humeral stem. This study highlights the importance of choosing the appropriate proximal shape and length of the humeral stem for press fit fixation in RSA.
Keywords: bone resorption; humeral stem; long follow up; pressfit; reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty.
© The Author(s) 2022.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Geoffroy Nourissat and Howard Harris are consultant for FX Shoulder solution
Figures




Similar articles
-
Press-fit vs. cemented humeral stem fixation for reverse shoulder arthroplasty: functional outcomes at a mean follow-up of 9.5 years.J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Jan;30(1):72-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.04.052. Epub 2020 Jun 9. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021. PMID: 32838951
-
Short-term evaluation of humeral stress shielding following reverse shoulder arthroplasty using press-fit fixation compared with cemented fixation.J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 May;29(5):906-912. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.09.042. Epub 2020 Jan 3. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020. PMID: 31911215
-
Humeral stem with low filling ratio reduces stress shielding in primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty.Int Orthop. 2022 Jun;46(6):1341-1349. doi: 10.1007/s00264-022-05383-4. Epub 2022 Mar 30. Int Orthop. 2022. PMID: 35353240
-
Stress shielding of the humerus in press-fit anatomic shoulder arthroplasty: review and recommendations for evaluation.J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Jun;27(6):1139-1147. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.12.020. Epub 2018 Feb 5. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018. PMID: 29422391 Review.
-
Cemented humeral stem versus press-fit humeral stem in total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Bone Joint J. 2019 Sep;101-B(9):1107-1114. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B9.BJJ-2018-1369.R1. Bone Joint J. 2019. PMID: 31474140
Cited by
-
Midterm outcomes of primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review of studies with minimum 5-year follow-up.JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2023 Oct 3;4(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2023.09.003. eCollection 2024 Feb. JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2023. PMID: 38323206 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Stress shielding in stemmed reverse shoulder arthroplasty: an updated review.SICOT J. 2024;10:37. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2024029. Epub 2024 Sep 20. SICOT J. 2024. PMID: 39303143 Free PMC article.
-
Radiographic Evaluation and Changes in Bone Density of the Humeral Side after Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 15;12(24):7698. doi: 10.3390/jcm12247698. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 38137767 Free PMC article.
-
Association between the canal filling ratio and bone resorption in trabecular metal stems in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a radiographic analysis using tomosynthesis.JSES Int. 2024 May 30;8(5):1077-1086. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.05.010. eCollection 2024 Sep. JSES Int. 2024. PMID: 39280137 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Burden EG, Batten TJ, Smith CD, et al.. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Bone Jt J. 2021;103-B(5):813–821. - PubMed
-
- Keener JD, Chalmers PN, Yamaguchi K. The humeral implant in shoulder arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2017;25(6):427–438. - PubMed
-
- Rossi LA, Guillermina BM, Buljubasich M, et al.. Cemented versus uncemented reverse shoulder arthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022;31(2):261–268. - PubMed
-
- Phadnis J, Huang T, Watts A, et al.. Cemented or cementless humeral fixation in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty? A systematic review. Bone Jt J. 2016;98-B(1):65–74. - PubMed
-
- Ascione F, Domos P, Guarrella V, et al.. Long-term humeral complications after grammont-style reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018;27(6):1065–1071. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources