Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 7:9:23333936221108706.
doi: 10.1177/23333936221108706. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.

Developing a Feasible and Credible Method for Analyzing Healthcare Documents as Written Data

Affiliations

Developing a Feasible and Credible Method for Analyzing Healthcare Documents as Written Data

Tanja Moilanen et al. Glob Qual Nurs Res. .

Abstract

Healthcare provides a rich, and constantly increasing, number of written documents, which are underutilized in research data for health and nursing sciences, but previous literature has only provided limited guidance on the process of document analysis. The aim of this paper is to provide a methodological framework for analyzing health care documents as written data, based on a systematic methodological review and the research team's experience of the method. Based on the results, the methods consist of seven phases: (i) identify the purpose, (ii) determine the document selection strategy, (iii) select or design an extraction matrix, (iv) carry out pilot testing, (v) collect and analyze the data, (vi) consider the credibility, and (vii) ethics of the study. The framework that has been developed can be used to carry out document analysis studies that are both feasible and credible.

Keywords: credibility; document analysis; feasibility; methodology; systematic methodological review; written data.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow chart of the literature searches and selection.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Phases of document analysis.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alonso V., Santos J. V., Pinto M., Ferreira J., Lema I., Lopes F., Freitas A. (2020). Health records as the basis of clinical coding: Is the quality adequate? A qualitative study of medical coders’ perceptions. Health Information Management Journal, 49(1), 28–37. 10.1177/1833358319826351 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Appleton J. V., Cowley S. (1997). Analysing clinical practice guidelines. A method of documentary analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 25(5), 1008–1017. https://doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.19970251008.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Atkinson P., Coffey A. (2010). Analysing documentary realities. In Silverman D. (Ed.), Qualitative research (pp. 56–76). SAGE.
    1. Boeije H. (2002). A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method. Quality & Quantity, 36(4), 391–409. https://doi:10.1023/A:1020909529486 - DOI
    1. Bowen G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi:10.3316/QRJ0902027 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources