Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 27:13:887470.
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.887470. eCollection 2022.

Baseline Severity of Sacroiliitis and Extensive Fat Metaplasia Predicts the Progression of Backfill at the Sacroiliac Joint in Patients With Axial Spondyloarthritis

Affiliations

Baseline Severity of Sacroiliitis and Extensive Fat Metaplasia Predicts the Progression of Backfill at the Sacroiliac Joint in Patients With Axial Spondyloarthritis

Yimeng Zhang et al. Front Immunol. .

Abstract

Objectives: Fat metaplasia in an erosion cavity, also known as backfill, is an essential intermediary in new bone formation in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) patients; however, the predictors of backfill progression are unknown. This longitudinal study aimed to assess the predictors of backfill progression in axSpA patients on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Methods: Clinical and MRI data were collected at baseline and follow-up in 52 axSpA patients. Backfill progression was defined as the new or increased T1 hyperintensity within the SI joint space. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the predictors of the backfill progression.

Results: A total of 19 patients had "backfill" at baseline and 30 patients exhibited the backfill progression after follow-up. The mean disease duration and SPARCC scores at baseline were significantly different between patients with and without backfill progression (P<0.001, P=0.003, respectively). Patients with backfill progression had a higher frequency of backfill at baseline, a higher SSS score of fat metaplasia, and a higher SSS score of backfill than those without (P=0.001, P<0.001, and P=0.002, respectively). A higher fat fraction value in the fat metaplasia area at the baseline was more frequent in patients with, than without, backfill progression (P=0.019). In the univariate logistic regression analyses, a higher SPARCC score for inflammation and a higher SSS score for fat metaplasia at baseline were associated with backfill progression.

Conclusions: Severity of sacroiliitis and extensive fat metaplasia at baseline are predictors of the backfill progression in axSpA patients.

Keywords: axial spondyloarthritis; backfill; fat metaplasia; magnetic resonance imaging; sacroiliac joint; sacroiliitis; spondyloarthritis research consortium of canada (SPARCC).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the study. axSpA, axial spondyloarthritis; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; TNFα, tumor necrosis factor alpha.
Figure 2
Figure 2
MRI findings of an 18-year-old male with HLA-B27 positive ankylosing spondylitis at baseline (A) and 6-month follow-up (B). Coronal oblique T1 images show new ‘backfill’ at the right sacroiliac joints (white arrows) after 6-month follow-up.
Figure 3
Figure 3
MRI findings of a 38-year-old female with HLA-B27 negative axial spondyloarthritis at baseline (A) and 12-month follow-up (B). Coronal oblique T1 images show fat metaplasia at both sacroiliac joint surfaces, however, no backfill occurs after 12-month follow-up.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Mean scores in (A) BME, (B) erosion, (C) fat metaplasia and (D) backfill according to backfill progression or not. Mean values in (E) ADC and (F) FF values according to backfill progression or not. BME ranges in score from 0 to 72. Erosion and fat metaplasia range in score from 0 to 40. Backfill ranges in score from 0 to 20. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Laloo F, Herregods N, Jaremko JL, Carron P, Elewaut D, Van den Bosch F, et al. . Mri of the Axial Skeleton in Spondyloarthritis: The Many Faces of New Bone Formation. Insights Imaging (2019) 10(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s13244-019-0752-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Maksymowych WP, Lambert RG, Ostergaard M, Pedersen SJ, Machado PM, Weber U, et al. . Mri Lesions in the Sacroiliac Joints of Patients With Spondyloarthritis: An Update of Definitions and Validation by the Asas Mri Working Group. Ann Rheum Dis (2019) 78(11):1550–8. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215589 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Maksymowych WP, Inman RD, Salonen D, Dhillon SS, Williams M, Stone M, et al. . Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada Magnetic Resonance Imaging Index for Assessment of Sacroiliac Joint Inflammation in Ankylosing Spondylitis. Arthritis Rheum (2005) 53(5):703–9. doi: 10.1002/art.21445 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Maksymowych WP. The Role of Imaging in the Diagnosis and Management of Axial Spondyloarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol (2019) 15(11):657–72. doi: 10.1038/s41584-019-0309-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. MacKay JW, Aboelmagd S, Gaffney JK. Correlation Between Clinical and Mri Disease Activity Scores in Axial Spondyloarthritis. Clin Rheumatol (2015) 34(9):1633–8. doi: 10.1007/s10067-015-2936-8 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources