Reduction in Postprandial Peak Glucose With Increased Technosphere Insulin Dosage
- PMID: 35833638
- PMCID: PMC10973860
- DOI: 10.1177/19322968221110622
Reduction in Postprandial Peak Glucose With Increased Technosphere Insulin Dosage
Abstract
Background: Technosphere Insulin (TI) is an ultra-rapid-acting inhaled insulin. This study assessed the mean peak two-hour postprandial glucose concentration with the initial TI dose (dose 1) calculated per the current label (United State Prescribing Information) compared with a ~2× higher dose (dose 2). Secondary objectives were to evaluate hypoglycemia within the two-hour postprandial period, evaluate change in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) before and after the two-hour postprandial period, and monitor for other adverse events.
Methods: Twenty patients with diabetes, on basal-bolus insulin therapy, received an initial dose 1 of TI followed by the higher dose 2, one to three days later. Subjects received an identical meal for both visits, and TI doses were administered immediately prior to the meal.
Results: The higher dose 2 provided significant reductions in mean postprandial glucose excursion (PPGE) in the two-hour postprandial period starting from 45 minutes (P = .008) to 120 minutes (P < .0001). Mean peak glucose was reduced from 228.6 to 179.3 mg/dL (P < .001) at two hours. Two hypoglycemic events (one level 1, one level 2) were observed in a single subject during the two-hour postprandial period with dose 2. There were no significant changes in FEV1 after either dose of TI.
Conclusions: The higher dose 2 reduced PPGE versus the current label recommended dose 1 within the two-hour postprandial timeframe without any new safety concerns. When confirmed with a larger study, this higher TI dosing recommendation may help patients and clinicians minimize immediate postprandial hyperglycemia when titrating TI for prandial glucose control.
Keywords: inhaled insulin; pharmacokinetics; postprandial glucose; type 1 diabetes; type 2 diabetes.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: TSB has received research support from Abbott, Capillary Biomedical, Dexcom, Diasome, Eli Lilly, Kowa, Lexicon, Medtronic, Medtrum, Novo Nordisk, REMD, Sanofi, Senseonics, Viacyte, vTv Therapeutics, and Zealand Pharma; consulting honoraria from Abbott, Lifescan, Novo Nordisk, and Sanofi; and speaking honoraria from Medtronic and Sanofi. MC has received research funding from Abbott Diabetes Care, Biolinq, Dexcom, Medtronic, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Senseonics, and Eli Lilly and Company. KBK, SB, JU, BS, and JH are employees and stockholders of MannKind Corporation.
Figures
References
-
- Cryer PE. Hypoglycemia: still the limiting factor in the glycemic management of diabetes. Endocr Pract. 2008;14(6):750-756. - PubMed
-
- Lundkvist J, Berne C, Bolinder B, Jonsson L. The economic and quality of life impact of hypoglycemia. Eur J Health Econ. 2005;6:197-202. - PubMed
-
- Giorda CB, Ozzello A, Gentile S, et al.. Incidence and risk factors for severe and symptomatic hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes. Results of the HYPOS-1 study. Acta Diabetol. 2015;52:845-853. - PubMed
-
- Cariou B, Fontaine P, Eschwege E, et al.. Frequency and predictors of confirmed hypoglycaemia in type 1 and insulin-treated type 2 diabetes mellitus patients in a real-life setting: results from the DIALOG study. Diabetes Metab. 2015;41:116-125. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
