Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb;280(2):661-669.
doi: 10.1007/s00405-022-07532-2. Epub 2022 Jul 14.

Creation of an incus recess for a middle-ear microphone using a drill or laser ablation: a comparison of equivalent noise level and middle ear transfer function

Affiliations

Creation of an incus recess for a middle-ear microphone using a drill or laser ablation: a comparison of equivalent noise level and middle ear transfer function

Robert P Morse et al. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: Studies have assessed the trauma and change in hearing function from the use of otological drills on the ossicular chain, but not the effects of partial laser ablation of the incus. A study of the effectiveness of a novel middle-ear microphone for a cochlear implant, which required an incus recess for the microphone balltip, provided an opportunity to compare methods and inform a feasibility study of the microphone with patients.

Methods: We used laser Doppler vibrometry with an insert earphone and probe microphone in 23 ears from 14 fresh-frozen cadavers to measure the equivalent noise level at the tympanic membrane that would have led to the same stapes velocity as the creation of the incus recess.

Results: Drilling on the incus with a diamond burr created peak noise levels equivalent to 125.1-155.0 dB SPL at the tympanic membrane, whilst using the laser generated equivalent noise levels barely above the baseline level. The change in middle ear transfer function following drilling showed greater variability at high frequencies, but the change was not statistically significant in the three frequency bands tested.

Conclusions: Whilst drilling resulted in substantially higher equivalent noise, we considered that the recess created by laser ablation was more likely to lead to movement of the microphone balltip, and therefore decrease performance or result in malfunction over time. For patients with greatly reduced residual hearing, the greater consistency from drilling the incus recess may outweigh the potential benefits of hearing preservation with laser ablation.

Keywords: Equivalent noise level; Laser Doppler vibrometry; Middle ear microphone; Middle ear transfer function; Noise-induced hearing loss.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Geometric mean (thick solid line) and 95% confidence interval (shaded grey region) of the 18 METFs that satisfied the inclusion criteria. The modified Rosowski criteria [23, 25] are shown by the dashed lines
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Example waveforms (left panels) and equivalent noise spectra (right panels) of Laser Doppler vibrometry recordings made during formation of an incus recess by drilling (top panels, cadaver C7R-D), or laser ablation (bottom panels, cadaver C10L-L). The waveforms show the velocity of the stapes and the equivalent noise spectra show the sound pressure level (SPL) across frequency of an acoustic signal at the position of the ear insert that would lead to equivalent energy at the stapes due to the drilling or ablation. The vertical reference lines in the plots of stapes velocity show the time windows used in the spectral analysis. Note that the waveforms for the drilling (a) and laser ablation (c) are shown on different axes
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Equivalent noise level in 1/3 octave frequency bands during formation of the incus recess using a drill or laser ablation. Box whiskers are shown for frequency bands with centre frequencies at 500 Hz, 1 kHz, 2 kHz, and 4 kHz. Boxes show the 25 and 75th percentiles with the median shown by horizontal lines. The outliers outside 1.5 times the interquartile range are shown by the diamond symbol
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Change in the normalized velocity of the stapes for individual cadavers following formation of a recess in the incus using a drill and b laser
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Mean change in the METFs following a recess in the incus made with a drill (N = 8) or laser (N = 10). Box whiskers are shown for all frequencies and for three sub-bands: up to 1000 Hz, 1000 Hz up to 4000 Hz, 4000 Hz and above. Boxes show the 25 and 75th percentiles with the median shown by horizontal lines. Outliers outside 1.5 times the interquartile range are shown by the diamond symbols

References

    1. Hallén O, Tjellström A. The use of the drill in ear surgery. Acta Otolaryngol. 1975;80:81–85. doi: 10.3109/00016487509121304. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kylén P, Stjernvall J-E, Arlinger S. Variables affecting the drill-generated noise levels in ear surgery. Acta Otolaryngol. 1977;84(1–6):252–257. doi: 10.3109/00016487709123964. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Helms J. Acoustic trauma from the bone cutting burr. J Laryngol Otol. 1976;90:1143–1149. doi: 10.1017/s0022215100083225. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schuknecht HF, Tonndorf J. Acoustic trauma of the cochlea from ear surgery. Laryngoscope. 1960;70(4):479–505. doi: 10.1288/00005537-196004000-00011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Paksoy M, Sanli A, Hardal U, Kibar S, Altin G, Erdogan BA, Bekmez ZE. How drill-generated acoustic trauma effects hearing functions in an ear surgery? Int J Head Neck Surg. 2012;3(3):127–132. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10001-1112. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources