Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 14;79(9):254.
doi: 10.1007/s00284-022-02947-w.

Antimicrobial Effects of Nanostructured Rare-Earth-Based Orthovanadates

Affiliations

Antimicrobial Effects of Nanostructured Rare-Earth-Based Orthovanadates

Serpil Gonca et al. Curr Microbiol. .

Abstract

The search for novel antimicrobial agents is of huge importance. Nanomaterials can come to the rescue in this case. The aim of this study was to assess the cytotoxicity and antimicrobial effects of rare-earth-based orthovanadate nanoparticles. The cytotoxicity against host cells and antimicrobial activity of LaVO4:Eu3+ and GdVO4:Eu3+ nanoparticles were analyzed. Effects of nanomaterials on fibroblasts were assessed by MTT, neutral red uptake and scratch assays. The antimicrobial effects were evaluated by the micro-dilution method estimating the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of nanoparticles against various strains of microorganisms, DNA cleavage and biofilm inhibition. GdVO4:Eu3+ nanoparticles were found to be less toxic against eukaryotic cells compared with LaVO4:Eu3+. Both nanoparticles exhibited antimicrobial activity and the highest MIC values were 64 mg/L for E. hirae, E. faecalis and S. aureus shown by GdVO4:Eu3+ nanoparticles. Nanoparticles demonstrated good DNA cleavage activity and induction of double-strand breaks in supercoiled plasmid DNA even at the lowest concentrations used. Both nanoparticles showed the biofilm inhibition activity against S. aureus at 500 mg/L and reduced the microbial cell viability. Taken the results of host toxicity and antimicrobial activity studies, it can be assumed that GdVO4:Eu3+ nanoparticles are more promising antibacterial agents compared with LaVO4:Eu3+ nanoparticles.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Butov D, Lange C, Heyckendorf J, Kalmykova I, Butova T, Borovok N et al (2020) Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in the Kharkiv Region. Ukraine Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 24(5):485–491. https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtld.19.0508 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zaman SB, Hussain MA, Nye R, Mehta V, Mamun KT, Hossain N (2017) A review on antibiotic resistance: alarm bells are ringing. Cureus ven 9(6):e1403. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1403 - DOI
    1. Giacomini E, Perrone V, Alessandrini D, Paoli D, Nappi C, Degli Esposti L (2021) Evidence of antibiotic resistance from population-based studies: a narrative review. Infect Drug Resist 14:849–858. https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S289741 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Aslam B, Wang W, Arshad MI, Khurshid M, Muzammil S, Rasool MH, Nisar MA, Alvi RF, Aslam MA, Qamar MU, Salamat MKF, Baloch Z (2018) Antibiotic resistance: a rundown of a global crisis. Infect Drug Resist 11:1645–1658. https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S173867 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. World Health Organization. (2015). Global action plan on antimicrobial resistance. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/193736 . Accessed 15 Dec 2021

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources