Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 2;56(15):10987-10996.
doi: 10.1021/acs.est.2c03467. Epub 2022 Jul 14.

Dairy Manure Co-composting with Wood Biochar Plays a Critical Role in Meeting Global Methane Goals

Affiliations

Dairy Manure Co-composting with Wood Biochar Plays a Critical Role in Meeting Global Methane Goals

Brendan P Harrison et al. Environ Sci Technol. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Livestock are the largest source of anthropogenic methane (CH4) emissions, and in intensive dairy systems, manure management can contribute half of livestock CH4. Recent policies such as California's short-lived climate pollutant reduction law (SB 1383) and the Global Methane Pledge call for cuts to livestock CH4 by 2030. However, investments in CH4 reduction strategies are primarily aimed at liquid dairy manure, whereas stockpiled solids remain a large source of CH4. Here, we measure the CH4 and net greenhouse gas reduction potential of dairy manure biochar-composting, a novel manure management strategy, through a composting experiment and life-cycle analysis. We found that biochar-composting reduces CH4 by 79%, compared to composting without biochar. In addition to reducing CH4 during composting, we show that the added climate benefit from biochar production and application contributes to a substantially reduced life-cycle global warming potential for biochar-composting: -535 kg CO2e Mg-1 manure compared to -194 kg CO2e Mg-1 for composting and 102 kg CO2e Mg-1 for stockpiling. If biochar-composting replaces manure stockpiling and complements anaerobic digestion, California could meet SB 1383 with 132 less digesters. When scaled up globally, biochar-composting could mitigate 1.59 Tg CH4 yr-1 while doubling the climate change mitigation potential from dairy manure management.

Keywords: biochar; climate change mitigation; composting; livestock; methane; natural climate solutions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cumulative CH4 (a) and CO2 (b) emissions over the 35-day composting experiment. CH4 emissions are expressed in units of g CH4 kg–1 dry feedstock. CO2 emissions are expressed in units of g CO2 kg–1 dry feedstock. The black curve shows cumulative emissions from biochar-composting, and the yellow curve shows cumulative emissions from composting. The shaded region for each curve shows the 95% confidence interval for each pile’s gas flux measurements.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Life-cycle assessment of management strategies for separated solid dairy manure using 100-year GWPs. The number above each strategy is the net GWP in kg CO2e Mg–1 manure. Each color represents a different life-cycle stage and is referenced in the legend above. The transportation stages are removed from the figure due to their minuscule contribution to the total GWP of each strategy.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Number of anaerobic digesters needed to meet California’s 40% dairy CH4 reduction goal mandated by SB 1383 under different scenarios. The digester + stockpiling scenario assumes that dairies with anaerobic digesters stockpile their separated solid manure. The digester + biochar-composting scenario assumes that dairies with anaerobic digesters biochar-compost their separated solid manure. The enhanced population reduction scenario assumes that dairies with anaerobic digesters biochar-compost their separated solid manure and that the statewide herd population declines at an annual rate of 1% instead of the California Air Resources Board’s (CARB) projected annual reduction of 0.5%, which is used in the other scenarios. In addition to assumed population reduction rates, each scenario assumes CARB projected rates for implementing new alternative manure management projects at dairies not large enough for anaerobic digesters.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Technical GHG and CH4 global mitigation potential from dairy manure management. (a) Net life-cycle GHG mitigation from dairy manure management consists of anaerobic digestion of dairy manure and varying degrees of biochar-composting of separated solid manure. (b) CH4 mitigation from dairy manure management consists of anaerobic digestion of dairy manure and varying degrees of biochar-composting of separated solid manure. For each figure, the x-axis shows the hypothetical number of dairy cows (in million heads) managed in systems with anaerobic digesters. We limit our analysis to the number of dairy cows kept in intensive systems globally. The y-axis shows the percent of solid manure separated from digesters that is managed through biochar-composting. Solid manure that is not biochar-composted is assumed to be stockpiled.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Crippa M.; Solazzo E.; Guizzardi D.; Monforti-Ferrario F.; Tubiello F. N. A. Leip Food systems are responsible for a third of global anthropogenic GHG emissions. Nat. Food 2021, 2, 198–209. 10.1038/s43016-021-00225-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Höglund-Isaksson L.; Gómez-Sanabria A.; Klimont Z.; Rafaj P.; Schöp W. Technical potentials and costs for reducing global anthropogenic methane emissions in the 2050 timeframe - results from the GAINS model. Environ. Res. Commum. 2020, 2, 02500410.1088/2515-7620/ab7457. - DOI
    1. Herrero M.; Henderson B.; Havlík P.; Thornton P.; Conant R.; Smith P.; Wirsenius S.; Hristov A.; Gerber P.; Gill M.; Buterbach-Bahl K.; Valin H.; Garnett T.; Stehfest E. Greenhouse gas mitigation potentials in the livestock sector. Nat. Clim. Change 2016, 6, 452–461. 10.1038/nclimate2925. - DOI
    1. Donham K. J.; Wing S.; Osterberg D.; Flora J.; Hodne C.; Thu K.; Thorne P. Community health and socioeconomic issues surrounding concentrated animal feeding operations. Environ. Health Persp. 2007, 115, 317–320. 10.1289/ehp.8836. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Owen J. J.; Silver W. Greenhouse gas emissions from dairy manure management: a review of field-based studies. Glob. Change Biol. 2015, 21, 550–565. 10.1111/gcb.12687. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types