Exploring metrics for the characterization of the cerebral autoregulation during head-up tilt and propofol general anesthesia
- PMID: 35834916
- DOI: 10.1016/j.autneu.2022.103011
Exploring metrics for the characterization of the cerebral autoregulation during head-up tilt and propofol general anesthesia
Abstract
Techniques grounded on the simultaneous utilization of Tiecks' second order differential equations and spontaneous variability of mean arterial pressure (MAP) and mean cerebral blood flow velocity (MCBFV), recorded from middle cerebral arteries through a transcranial Doppler device, provide a characterization of cerebral autoregulation (CA) via the autoregulation index (ARI). These methods exploit two metrics for comparing the measured MCBFV series with the version predicted by Tiecks' model: normalized mean square prediction error (NMSPE) and normalized correlation ρ. The aim of this study is to assess the two metrics for ARI computation in 13 healthy subjects (age: 27 ± 8 yrs., 5 males) at rest in supine position (REST) and during 60° head-up tilt (HUT) and in 19 patients (age: 64 ± 8 yrs., all males), scheduled for coronary artery bypass grafting, before (PRE) and after (POST) propofol general anesthesia induction. Analyses were carried out over the original MAP and MCBFV pairs and surrogate unmatched couples built individually via time-shifting procedure. We found that: i) NMSPE and ρ metrics exhibited similar performances in passing individual surrogate test; ii) the two metrics could lead to different ARI estimates; iii) CA was not different during HUT or POST compared to baseline and this conclusion held regardless of the technique and metric for ARI estimation. Results suggest a limited impact of the sympathetic control on CA.
Keywords: Autonomic nervous system; Autoregulation index; Cardiovascular control; Cerebral blood flow; Mean arterial pressure; Spontaneous variability.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Dynamic cerebrovascular autoregulation in patients prone to postural syncope: Comparison of techniques assessing the autoregulation index from spontaneous variability series.Auton Neurosci. 2022 Jan;237:102920. doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2021.102920. Epub 2021 Nov 18. Auton Neurosci. 2022. PMID: 34808528
-
Does stroke subtype and measurement technique influence estimation of cerebral autoregulation in acute ischaemic stroke?Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013;35(3):257-61. doi: 10.1159/000347075. Epub 2013 Mar 26. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013. PMID: 23548789
-
Causality analysis reveals the link between cerebrovascular control and acute kidney dysfunction after coronary artery bypass grafting.Physiol Meas. 2019 Jul 1;40(6):064006. doi: 10.1088/1361-6579/ab21b1. Physiol Meas. 2019. PMID: 31091519
-
The Impact of the Estimation Strategy of the Cerebral Critical Closing Pressure on the Autoregulation Index.Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2024 Jul;2024:1-4. doi: 10.1109/EMBC53108.2024.10781748. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2024. PMID: 40038953
-
Critical analysis of cerebrovascular autoregulation during repeated head-up tilt.Stroke. 2001 Oct;32(10):2403-8. doi: 10.1161/hs1001.097225. Stroke. 2001. PMID: 11588333 Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Static autoregulation in humans.J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2024 Nov;44(11):1191-1207. doi: 10.1177/0271678X231210430. Epub 2023 Nov 7. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2024. PMID: 37933742 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources