Women's experiences and expectations of intimate partner abuse identification in healthcare settings: a qualitative evidence synthesis
- PMID: 35835525
- PMCID: PMC9289017
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058582
Women's experiences and expectations of intimate partner abuse identification in healthcare settings: a qualitative evidence synthesis
Abstract
Objectives: To explore women's experiences and expectations of intimate partner abuse (IPA) disclosure and identification in healthcare settings, focusing on the process of disclosure/identification rather than the healthcare responses that come afterwards.
Design: Systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies DATA SOURCES: Relevant studies were sourced by using keywords to search the databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, SocINDEX and ASSIA in September 2021.
Eligibility criteria: Studies needed to focus on women's views about IPA disclosure and identification in healthcare settings, use qualitative methods and have been published in the last 5 years.
Data extraction and synthesis: Relevant data were extracted into a customised template. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist for qualitative research was used to assess the methodological quality of included studies. A thematic synthesis approach was applied to the data, and confidence in the findings was appraised using The Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research methods.
Results: Thirty-four studies were included from a range of healthcare settings and countries. Three key themes were generated through analysing their data: (1) Provide universal education, (2) Create a safe and supportive environment for disclosure and (3) It is about how you ask. Included papers were rated overall as being of moderate quality, and moderate-high confidence was placed in the review findings.
Conclusions: Women in the included studies articulated a desire to routinely receive information about IPA, lending support to a universal education approach that equips all women with an understanding of IPA and options for assistance, regardless of disclosure. Women's suggestions for how to promote an environment conducive to disclosure and how to enquire about IPA have clear implications for clinical practice.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42018091523.
Keywords: PUBLIC HEALTH; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; Quality in health care.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Figures
References
-
- World Health Organization . Responding to intimate partner violence and sexual violence against women: who clinical and policy guidelines. World Health Organization, 2013. - PubMed
-
- García-Moreno C, Pallitto C, Devries K. Global and regional estimates of violence against women: prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and Non-Partner sexual violence. World Health Organization, 2013.
-
- García-Moreno C, Jansen H, Ellsberg M. WHO Multi-Country Study on Women’s Health and Domestic Violence Against Women 2005;204:1–18.
-
- Mackenzie M, Gannon M, Stanley N, et al. 'You certainly don't go back to the doctor once you've been told, "I'll never understand women like you."' Seeking candidacy and structural competency in the dynamics of domestic abuse disclosure. Sociol Health Illn 2019;41:1159–74. 10.1111/1467-9566.12893 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical