Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 14;12(7):e061085.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061085.

Has the share of the working life expectancy that is spent receiving a partial or full disability pension changed in Finland over the period 2005-2018? A longitudinal register-based study

Taina Leinonen  1 , Eira Viikari-Juntura  2 , Svetlana Solovieva  2
Affiliations

Has the share of the working life expectancy that is spent receiving a partial or full disability pension changed in Finland over the period 2005-2018? A longitudinal register-based study

Taina Leinonen et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: The share of the overall working careers that is spent receiving disability benefits is unclear. We examined trends in full-time equivalent working life expectancy (FTE-WLE) among those with and without receiving a permanent full or partial disability pension in Finland, where certain amounts of work are allowed while receiving these pensions.

Design: Longitudinal register-based study.

Setting: Finnish population.

Participants: Nationally representative 70% samples of the working-age population.

Outcome: Using the Sullivan method, we examined annual FTE-WLE at age 45, truncated at age 63, in 2005-2018 by disability pension status. Full-time equivalent work participation was based on combined information on annual employment days and work income.

Results: Compared with those with no disability pension, disability pensioners had a larger relative (full and partial pensioners of both genders) and absolute (male partial pensioners) increase in the FTE-WLE between 2005 and 2018. In 2018, the FTE-WLE of both male and female full disability pensioners was around 3.5 months, being 6 months at its highest in musculoskeletal diseases. The FTE-WLE of partial disability pensioners was around 6.5 and 8 years among men and women, respectively, being around half of the corresponding expectancies of non-pensioners. The FTE-WLE of partial disability pensioners was considerable in musculoskeletal diseases and mental disorders and even higher in other diseases. Full disability pensioners spent a disproportionately large time in manual work, increasingly in the private sector, and partial pensioners in the public sector with lower non-manual and manual work, increasingly with the former. At the population level, the share of the FTE-WLE that is spent receiving a disability pension remained relatively small.

Conclusions: Increased work participation while receiving a disability pension is likely to have had important implications for prolonging individual working careers but only minor contribution to the length of working lives at the population level.

Keywords: epidemiology; occupational & industrial medicine; public health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

References

    1. OECD. Sickness, disability and work: breaking the barriers: a synthesis of findings across OECD countries. Paris: OECD, 2010.
    1. Røed K. Active social insurance. IZA J Labor Policy 2012;1:8. 10.1186/2193-9004-1-8 - DOI
    1. Høgelund J, Holm A, McIntosh J. Does graded return-to-work improve sick-listed workers' chance of returning to regular working hours? J Health Econ 2010;29:158–69. 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2009.11.009 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andrén D, Svensson M. Part-Time sick leave as a treatment method for individuals with musculoskeletal disorders. J Occup Rehabil 2012;22:418–26. 10.1007/s10926-011-9348-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Markussen S, Mykletun A, Røed K. The case for presenteeism — Evidence from Norway’s sickness insurance program. J Public Econ 2012;96:959–72. 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.08.008 - DOI

Publication types