Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 14;18(1):275.
doi: 10.1186/s12917-022-03371-9.

Changes in salivary analytes in cows due to the in vitro presence of feed

Affiliations

Changes in salivary analytes in cows due to the in vitro presence of feed

M D Contreras-Aguilar et al. BMC Vet Res. .

Abstract

Background: The effect in a sialochemistry profile of the presence of usually available feed in dairy cows was evaluated by an in vitro experiment. For this purpose, a pooled clean saliva from five healthy dairy cows was incubated five times with a standard feed based on a total mixed ration (F), wheat hay (H), and grass (G). The salivary panel was integrated by biomarkers of stress (cortisol -sCor-, salivary alpha-amylase -sAA-, butyrylcholinesterase -BChE-, total esterase -TEA-, and lipase -Lip-), immunity (adenosine deaminase -ADA-), oxidative status (Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity -TEAC-, the ferric reducing ability of saliva -FRAS-, the cupric reducing antioxidant capacity -CUPRAC-, uric acid, and advanced oxidation protein products -AOPP-), and enzymes, proteins, and minerals of general metabolism and markers of liver, muscle, and renal damage (aspartate aminotransferase -AST-, alanine aminotransferase -ALP-, γ-glutamyl transferase -gGT-, lactate dehydrogenase -LDH-, creatine kinase -CK-, creatinine, urea, triglycerides, glucose, lactate, total protein, phosphorus, and total calcium).

Results: Most of the evaluated analytes showed a coefficient of variations (CV) higher than 15% and/or significant changes compared with the clean saliva when feed was present. Some analytes, such as the oxidative status biomarkers (CV > 80%), AST (CV > 60%), or glucose (CV > 100%), showed significant changes with all the feed types tested. Others showed significant differences only with certain types of feed, such as LDH with F (CV > 60%) or triglycerides with F (CV > 100%) and H (CV > 95%). However, sCor or gGT remained unchanged (CV < 15%, P > 0.05) in all the treatments.

Conclusions: The presence of feed can produce changes in most of the analytes measured in cows' saliva, being of high importance to consider this factor when saliva is used as a sample to avoid errors in the interpretation of the results.

Keywords: Biomarkers; Cow; Feed contamination; Saliva; Sialochemistry.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Color obtained after the centrifugation of the Salivette tubes once a cows’ saliva pool and deionized water were submitted to incubation during 5 min at 38 °C (C2) and with 250 mg of feed-based on a standard total mixed ration usually offered to lactation cows in production (F), wheat hay (H), and grass (G)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Coefficient of variations (CVs) of the means (n = 5) from the specimens C2 (cows’ saliva pool submitted to incubation during 5 min at 38 °C), F, H, and G (cows’ saliva pool submitted to incubation with 250 mg of feed-based a standard total mixed ration, wheat hay, and grass, respectively) compared to their control clean saliva pool (specimen C1)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
In vitro experimental workflow performed for the food effect evaluation in a profile of salivary analytes measurement in pool saliva from five cows during five different days. *Standard feed based on a total mixed ration (broccoli -remains-, oat silage, corn -ground-, barley -bagasse-, alfalfa silage, wet corn pulp, rapeseed, dehydrated alfalfa, dry beet pulp, non-protein hydrogen source, barley straw, and a mineral pre-mix)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. García Pinillos R, Appleby MC, Manteca X, Scott-Park F, Smith C, Velarde A. One Welfare - A platform for improving human and animal welfare. Vet Rec. 2016;179:412–413. doi: 10.1136/vr.i5470. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tvarijonaviciute A, Martínez-Subiela S, López-Jornet P, Lamy E. Saliva in Health and Disease The Present and Future of a Unique Sample for Diagnosis. 1st edition. Switzerland: Springer, Cham; 2020. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-37681-9.
    1. Burnett TA, Madureira AML, Silper BF, Nadalin A, Tahmasbi A, Veira DM, et al. Short communication: Factors affecting hair cortisol concentrations in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2014;97:7685–7690. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-8444. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lamy E, Mau M. Saliva proteomics as an emerging, non-invasive tool to study livestock physiology, nutrition and diseases. J Proteomics. 2012;75:4251–4258. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2012.05.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Velarde A, Fàbrega E, Blanco-Penedo I, Dalmau A. Animal welfare towards sustainability in pork meat production. Meat Sci. 2015;109:13–17. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2015.05.010. - DOI - PubMed