Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2022 Jul 1:16:2105-2117.
doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S354570. eCollection 2022.

Oral Sedation is Non-Inferior to Intravenous Sedation for Cornea and Glaucoma Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Hyunjoo J Lee  1 , Manishi A Desai  1 , Natalie Sadlak  1 , Marissa G Fiorello  1 , Wanjiku G Githere  1 , Manju L Subramanian  1 ; Oral versus Intravenous Sedation Study Group
Collaborators, Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Oral Sedation is Non-Inferior to Intravenous Sedation for Cornea and Glaucoma Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Hyunjoo J Lee et al. Clin Ophthalmol. .

Abstract

Purpose: To determine whether oral sedation is as safe and effective as IV sedation for ophthalmic surgeries other than cataract surgery, we tested whether patient satisfaction with oral triazolam was non-inferior to IV midazolam for cornea and glaucoma surgeries.

Patients and methods: Seventy-five cornea and 49 glaucoma surgery patients 18 years and older at Boston Medical Center (Boston, MA) were randomized within each study group (cornea or glaucoma) to receive oral triazolam + IV placebo, or oral placebo + IV midazolam before surgery in a double-masked fashion. Supplemental IV anesthesia was administered as needed during surgery. The primary outcome measure was patient satisfaction with anesthesia, compared between oral and IV sedation groups via t-test for non-inferiority, based on 70 cornea and 43 glaucoma subjects completing the study. Secondary outcome measures included surgeon and anesthesia provider satisfaction with anesthesia, rate of supplemental IV anesthesia, and incidence of adverse events and surgical complications.

Results: Using an a priori non-inferiority margin of 0.5, initial oral sedation was non-inferior to initial IV sedation in cornea (n=70, p<0.001) and glaucoma (n=43, p=0.017) groups, even after excluding subjects administered supplemental IV anesthesia. There were no significant differences in anesthesia provider or surgeon satisfaction, intra-operative complications, adverse events, or supplemental anesthesia between groups, except for higher anesthesia provider satisfaction with oral sedation in an Ahmed or Baerveldt implant ± cataract surgery sub-group (p=0.04). Subjects receiving supplemental anesthesia included 6 oral (18.2%) and 5 IV (13.5%) in the cornea group (p=0.59), and 7 oral (29.2%) and 6 IV (31.6%) in the glaucoma group (p=0.50).

Conclusion: Our results suggest that an initial dose of oral triazolam is equivalent to IV midazolam for non-cataract anterior segment surgeries. However, there was a relatively high need for supplemental IV anesthesia during some surgery types, particularly with glaucoma tube shunt implantation.

Keywords: anesthesia; cornea; glaucoma; midazolam; ophthalmic surgery; oral sedation; triazolam.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

    1. Nouvellon E, Cuvillon P, Ripart J. Regional anesthesia and eye surgery. Anesthesiology. 2010;113(5):1236–1242. doi:10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181f7a78e - DOI - PubMed
    1. Greenhalgh DL, Kumar CM. Sedation during ophthalmic surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2008;25(9):701–707. doi:10.1017/S0265021508004389 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Loots H, Wiseman R. Agents for sedation in ophthalmic surgery: a review of the pharmacodynamics and clinical applications. Curr Anaesth Crit Care. 2006;17(3–4):179–190. doi:10.1016/j.cacc.2006.09.001 - DOI
    1. Practice Guidelines for Preoperative Fasting and the Use of Pharmacologic Agents to Reduce the Risk of Pulmonary Aspiration. Application to healthy patients undergoing elective procedures: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists task force on preoperative fasting and the use of pharmacologic agents to reduce the risk of pulmonary aspiration. Anesthesiology. 2017;126(3):376–393. doi:10.1097/ALN.0000000000001452 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Reeves SW, Friedman DS, Fleisher LA, Lubomski LH, Schein OD, Bass EB. A decision analysis of anesthesia management for cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001;132(4):528–536. doi:10.1016/S0002-9394(01)01159-X - DOI - PubMed