Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jun 28:10:913728.
doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.913728. eCollection 2022.

CRISPR/Cas- and Topical RNAi-Based Technologies for Crop Management and Improvement: Reviewing the Risk Assessment and Challenges Towards a More Sustainable Agriculture

Affiliations
Review

CRISPR/Cas- and Topical RNAi-Based Technologies for Crop Management and Improvement: Reviewing the Risk Assessment and Challenges Towards a More Sustainable Agriculture

Fabiano Touzdjian Pinheiro Kohlrausch Távora et al. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. .

Abstract

Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated gene (Cas) system and RNA interference (RNAi)-based non-transgenic approaches are powerful technologies capable of revolutionizing plant research and breeding. In recent years, the use of these modern technologies has been explored in various sectors of agriculture, introducing or improving important agronomic traits in plant crops, such as increased yield, nutritional quality, abiotic- and, mostly, biotic-stress resistance. However, the limitations of each technique, public perception, and regulatory aspects are hindering its wide adoption for the development of new crop varieties or products. In an attempt to reverse these mishaps, scientists have been researching alternatives to increase the specificity, uptake, and stability of the CRISPR and RNAi system components in the target organism, as well as to reduce the chance of toxicity in nontarget organisms to minimize environmental risk, health problems, and regulatory issues. In this review, we discuss several aspects related to risk assessment, toxicity, and advances in the use of CRISPR/Cas and topical RNAi-based technologies in crop management and breeding. The present study also highlights the advantages and possible drawbacks of each technology, provides a brief overview of how to circumvent the off-target occurrence, the strategies to increase on-target specificity, the harm/benefits of association with nanotechnology, the public perception of the available techniques, worldwide regulatory frameworks regarding topical RNAi and CRISPR technologies, and, lastly, presents successful case studies of biotechnological solutions derived from both technologies, raising potential challenges to reach the market and being social and environmentally safe.

Keywords: exogenous dsRNA; gene silencing; genome editing; nanotechnology; offtargets; public acceptance; regulatory aspects; toxicity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

TC and HC were employed by the SEMPRE AgTech. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Summary of the main risks (on the left—in red color) and challenges (on the right—in green color) addressed in the text and related to the application of Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated gene (Cas)- and RNA interference (RNAi)-based technologies in agriculture. Created with Biorender software at https://biorender.com.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adeyinka O. S., Riaz S., Toufiq N., Yousaf I., Bhatti M. U., Batcho A. (2020). Advances in Exogenous RNA Delivery Techniques for RNAi-Mediated Pest Control. Mol. Biol. Rep. 47, 6309–6319. 10.1007/S11033-020-05666-2/FIGURES/1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ali Z., Abul-Faraj A., Li L., Ghosh N., Piatek M., Mahjoub A., et al. (2015a). Efficient Virus-Mediated Genome Editing in Plants Using the CRISPR/Cas9 System. Mol. Plant 8, 1288–1291. 10.1016/J.MOLP.2015.02.011 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ali Z., Abulfaraj A., Idris A., Ali S., Tashkandi M., Mahfouz M. M. (2015b). CRISPR/Cas9-mediated Viral Interference in Plants. Genome Biol. 16, 238. 10.1186/s13059-015-0799-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Altpeter F., Springer N. M., Bartley L. E., Blechl A. E., Brutnell T. P., Citovsky V., et al. (2016). Advancing Crop Transformation in the Era of Genome Editing. Plant Cell. 28, 1510–1520. 10.1105/tpc.16.00196 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andersson M., Turesson H., Olsson N., Fält A. S., Ohlsson P., Gonzalez M. N., et al. (2018). Genome Editing in Potato via CRISPR-Cas9 Ribonucleoprotein Delivery. Physiol. Plant. 164, 378–384. 10.1111/PPL.12731 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources