Importance of Local Ablative Therapies for Lung Metastases in Patients With Colorectal Cancer
- PMID: 35837890
- DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005466
Importance of Local Ablative Therapies for Lung Metastases in Patients With Colorectal Cancer
Abstract
Objective: To assess the effect of local ablative therapy (LAT) on overall survival in patients with lung metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC) compared with patients treated with systemic therapy.
Summary background data: CRC affects approximately 1.4 million individuals worldwide every year. The lungs are commonly affected by CRC, and there is no treatment standard for a secondary lung metastasis from CRC.
Methods: This longitudinal, retrospective cohort study (2010-2018) quantified the pulmonary and extrapulmonary tumor burden of 1143 patients by retrospectively reviewing computed tomography images captured at diagnosis. A comprehensive multidisciplinary approach informed how and when surgery and/or stereotactic body radiotherapy was administered.
Results: Among 1143 patients, 473 patients (41%) received LAT, with surgery first (n = 421) or stereotactic ablative radiation therapy first (n = 52) either at the time of diagnosis (n = 288), within 1 year (n = 132), or after 1 year (n = 53). LAT was repeated in 158 patients (33.4%, 384 total sessions) when new lung metastases were detected. The 5- and 10-year survival rates for patients treated with LAT (71.2% and 64.0%, respectively) were significantly higher than those of patients treated with systemic therapy alone (14.2% and 10.0%, respectively; P <0.001). The overall survival of patients who received LAT intervention increased as the total tumor burden decreased.
Conclusions: A high long-term survival rate was achievable in a significant portion of patients with lung metastasis from CRC by the timely administrations of LAT to standard systemic therapy. The tumor burden and LAT feasibility should be included in a discussion during the follow-up period.
Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 2015;136:E359–386
-
- Booth CM, Nanji S, Wei X, et al. Outcomes of resected colorectal cancer lung metastases in routine clinical practice: a population-based study. Ann Surg Oncol 2016;23:1057–1063
-
- Patel D, Townsend AR, Karapetis C, et al. Is survival for patients with resectable lung metastatic colorectal cancer comparable to those with resectable liver disease? Results from the South Australian Metastatic Colorectal Registry. Ann Surg Oncol 2016;23:3616–3622
-
- Treasure T, Farewell V, Macbeth F, et al. Pulmonary metastasectomy versus continued active monitoring in colorectal cancer (PulMiCC): a multicentre randomised clinical trial. Trials 2019;20:718
-
- Palma DA, Olson R, Harrow S, et al. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy versus standard of care palliative treatment in patients with oligometastatic cancers (SABR-COMET): a randomised, phase 2, open-label trial. Lancet 2019;393:2051–2058
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
