Shared Decision Making and Patient Preferences After Limb-Threatening Injuries
- PMID: 35837952
- DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005579
Shared Decision Making and Patient Preferences After Limb-Threatening Injuries
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Comment on
-
What Outcomes Are Most Important to Patients Following a Lower Extremity Limb-threatening Injury?Ann Surg. 2023 Jan 1;277(1):21-27. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005470. Epub 2022 Jul 7. Ann Surg. 2023. PMID: 35797182
References
-
- Bosse MJ, MacKenzie EJ, Kellam JF, et al. An analysis of outcomes of reconstruction or amputation after leg-threatening injuries. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1924–1931.
-
- Bernstein J, Kupperman E, Kandel LA, et al. Shared decision making, fast and slow: implications for informed consent, resource utilization, and patient satisfaction in orthopaedic surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2016;24:495–502.
-
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, The CAHPS Ambulatory Care Improvement Guide: Strategy 6I: Shared Decision Making. Rockville, MD; 2017.
-
- Alokozai A, Lin E, Crijns TJ, et al. Patient and surgeon ratings of patient involvement in decision-making are not aligned. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2022;104:767–773.
-
- Wong A, Burke CE, Bangura A, et al. What outcomes are most important to patients following a lower extremity limb-threatening injury? Ann Surg . 2023;277:21–27.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources