Experiences of mimicry in eating disorders
- PMID: 35841035
- PMCID: PMC9288029
- DOI: 10.1186/s40337-022-00607-9
Experiences of mimicry in eating disorders
Abstract
Background: People unknowingly mimic the behaviors of others, a process that results in feelings of affiliation. However, some individuals with eating disorders describe feeling "triggered" when mimicked. This study explores the effects of implicit non-verbal mimicry on individuals with a history of an eating disorder (ED-His) compared to healthy controls (HCs).
Method: Women (N = 118, nED-His = 31; Mage = 21 years) participated in a laboratory task with a confederate trained to either discreetly mimic (Mimicry condition) or not mimic (No-Mimicry condition) the mannerisms of the participant. Participants rated the likability of the confederate and the smoothness of the interaction.
Results: Participants in the No-Mimicry condition rated the confederate as significantly more likable than in the Mimicry condition, and ED-His rated the confederate as more likable than HCs. ED-His in the Mimicry condition rated the interaction as less smooth than HCs, whereas this pattern was not found in the No-Mimicry condition. Among ED-His, longer disorder duration (≥ 3.87 years) was associated with less liking of a confederate who mimicked and more liking of a confederate who did not mimic.
Conclusions: We discuss the implications of these findings for interpersonal therapeutic processes and group treatment settings for eating disorders. Our study on subtle, nonverbal mimicry revealed differences in social behavior for women with a history of an eating disorder compared to healthy women. For participants with an eating disorder history, a longer duration of illness was associated with a worse pattern of affiliation, reflected in lower liking of a mimicker. Further research on how diverging processes of affiliation may function to perpetuate the chronicity of eating disorders and implications for treatment is needed.
Keywords: Eating disorders; Imitative behavior; Interpersonal relations; Nonverbal communication; Social perception.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare they have no competing interests.
Figures



Similar articles
-
The Face of the Chameleon: The Experience of Facial Mimicry for the Mimicker and the Mimickee.J Soc Psychol. 2015;155(6):590-604. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2015.1032195. Epub 2015 Mar 26. J Soc Psychol. 2015. PMID: 25811746 Free PMC article.
-
The affiliative consequences of same-race and cross-race mimicry.J Soc Psychol. 2020 Sep 2;160(5):603-612. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2020.1719962. Epub 2020 Jan 28. J Soc Psychol. 2020. PMID: 31992152
-
Mimicry and helping behavior: an evaluation of mimicry on explicit helping request.J Soc Psychol. 2011 Jan-Feb;151(1):1-4. doi: 10.1080/00224540903366701. J Soc Psychol. 2011. PMID: 21375122
-
The Functionality of Spontaneous Mimicry and Its Influences on Affiliation: An Implicit Socialization Account.Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 31;7:458. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00458. eCollection 2016. Front Psychol. 2016. PMID: 27064398 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cognitive mechanisms for responding to mimicry from others.Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Apr;63:106-23. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.02.006. Epub 2016 Feb 11. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016. PMID: 26877104 Review.
References
-
- Corning AF, Krumm AJ, Smitham LA. Differential social comparison processes in women with and without eating disorder symptoms. J Couns Psychol. 2006;53(3):338–349. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.53.3.338. - DOI
-
- Fitzsimmons-Craft EE, Bardone-Cone AM, Bulik CM, Wonderlich SA, Crosby RD, Engel SG. Examining an elaborated sociocultural model of disordered eating among college women: the roles of social comparison and body surveillance. Body Image. 2014;11(4):488–500. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2014.07.012. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources