Safe abortion: A retrospective study of negative pressure suction in abortion under the monitoring of ultrasound
- PMID: 35842224
- DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14358
Safe abortion: A retrospective study of negative pressure suction in abortion under the monitoring of ultrasound
Abstract
Objective: To observe the effectiveness of ultrasound monitoring during negative pressure suction for abortion.
Methods: This retrospective study analyzed patients with abortion who underwent negative pressure suction, excluding 23 cases with incomplete information and missing interviews, leaving a total of 200 patients included in the study. They were divided into an ultrasound group (n = 100) and a non-ultrasound group (n = 100) based on whether ultrasound monitoring was used. The ultrasound group was applied negative pressure suction under ultrasound monitoring, and the non-ultrasound group was applied traditional negative pressure suction. The operative time and complications were assessed after the treatment.
Results: The operative time in the ultrasound group was 3.19 ± 0.62 min and in the non-ultrasound group was 6.35 ± 1.20 min, revealing a significantly shorter operative time in the ultrasound group than in the non-ultrasound group (P < 0.05). There was one case of uterine residual in the ultrasound group. There were eight cases with uterine residuals, four cases with intrauterine adhesions, one case with missed aspiration, and one case with perforation of the uterus in the non-ultrasound group. The complication rate in the ultrasound group was less than that in the non-ultrasound group (P < 0.05).
Conclusion: Ultrasound-monitored negative pressure suction has obvious advantages over ordinary negative pressure suction in that it can shorten operation time, reduce operative complications, and ensure a safe and effective abortion.
Keywords: abortion; negative pressure suction; ultrasound monitoring.
© 2022 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
Similar articles
-
A five-year experience with second-trimester induced abortions: no increase in complication rate as compared to the first trimester.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Feb;168(2):633-7. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90509-h. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993. PMID: 8438943
-
Assessment of Risk Factors of Intrauterine Adhesions in Patients With Induced Abortion and the Curative Effect of Hysteroscopic Surgery.J Invest Surg. 2019 Jan;32(1):85-89. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2017.1376130. Epub 2017 Oct 3. J Invest Surg. 2019. PMID: 28972429
-
Evacuation of the gravid uterus by negative pressure (suction evacuation).Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1967 May 1;98(1):18-22. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(67)90124-x. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1967. PMID: 6024723
-
Initiation of abortion before there is definitive ultrasound evidence of intrauterine pregnancy: A systematic review with meta-analyses.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020 Apr;99(4):451-458. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13797. Epub 2020 Jan 22. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020. PMID: 31883371
-
Fertility after contraception or abortion.Fertil Steril. 1990 Oct;54(4):559-73. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)53808-4. Fertil Steril. 1990. PMID: 2209874 Review.
Cited by
-
Added administration of estradiol valerate tosurgical treatment for missed abortion in early pregnancy.Am J Transl Res. 2025 Jun 15;17(6):4827-4838. doi: 10.62347/GVKI9955. eCollection 2025. Am J Transl Res. 2025. PMID: 40672574 Free PMC article.
-
A prediction nomogram for residual after negative pressure aspiration for endogenic cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: a retrospective study.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Feb 3;25(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07255-2. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025. PMID: 39901095 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Baruwa OJ, Amoateng AY, Biney E. Induced abortion in Ghana: prevalence and associated factors. J Biosoc Sci. 2022;54(2):257-268.
-
- Burtscher D, Schulte-Hillen C, Saint-Sauveur JF, de Plecker E, Nair M, Arsenijević J. "Better dead than being mocked": an anthropological study on perceptions and attitudes towards unwanted pregnancy and abortion in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2020;28(1):441-455.
-
- Burns RM, Shaw KA. Standardizing abortion education: what medical schools can learn from residency programs. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2020;32(6):387-392.
-
- Quenby S, Gallos ID, Dhillon-Smith RK, et al. Miscarriage matters: the epidemiological, physical, psychological, and economic costs of early pregnancy loss. Lancet. 2021;397(10285):1658-1667.
-
- Govender D, Naidoo S, Taylor M. Don't let sexual and reproductive health become collateral damage in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic: a public health perspective. Afr J Reprod Health. 2020;24(s1):56-63.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical