Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 16;12(1):12176.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16637-x.

Three-dimensional conditional generative adversarial network-based virtual thin-slice technique for the morphological evaluation of the spine

Affiliations

Three-dimensional conditional generative adversarial network-based virtual thin-slice technique for the morphological evaluation of the spine

Atsushi Nakamoto et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Virtual thin-slice (VTS) technique is a generative adversarial network-based algorithm that can generate virtual 1-mm-thick CT images from images of 3-10-mm thickness. We evaluated the performance of VTS technique for assessment of the spine. VTS was applied to 4-mm-thick CT images of 73 patients, and the visibility of intervertebral spaces was evaluated on the 4-mm-thick and VTS images. The heights of vertebrae measured on sagittal images reconstructed from the 4-mm-thick images and VTS images were compared with those measured on images reconstructed from 1-mm-thick images. Diagnostic performance for the detection of compression fractures was also compared. The intervertebral spaces were significantly more visible on the VTS images than on the 4-mm-thick images (P < 0.001). The absolute value of the measured difference in mean vertebral height between the VTS and 1-mm-thick images was smaller than that between the 4-mm-thick and 1-mm-thick images (P < 0.01-0.54). The diagnostic performance of the VTS images for detecting compression fracture was significantly lower than that of the 4-mm-thick images for one reader (P = 0.02). VTS technique enabled the identification of each vertebral body, and enabled accurate measurement of vertebral height. However, this technique is not suitable for diagnosing compression fractures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

S.K. has received funding support from FUJIFILM Corporation. J.M., A.K., and Y.K. are employees of FUJIFILM Corporation. A.N., M.H., H.O., T.O., H.F., K.O. and N.T. state that they have not received any funding for this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Adversarial training framework for thick–thin slice translation of CT images.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Sagittal reformatted images reconstructed from 1-mm-thick images (a), 4-mm-thick images (b), and virtual thin-slice images (c). The intervertebral spaces of the cervical and upper thoracic spine are not clearly depicted on the reconstruction from 4-mm-thick images. On the reconstruction of virtual thin-slice images, the intervertebral spaces are more clearly depicted and it is easier to recognize the shapes of the vertebral bodies.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Sagittal reformatted images reconstructed from 1-mm-thick images (a), 4-mm-thick images (b), and virtual thin-slice images (c). A compression fracture of the 8th thoracic vertebra is seen on the reconstruction from 1-mm-thick images (arrow), but is not depicted on that from virtual thin-slice images.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Sagittal reformatted images reconstructed from 1-mm-thick images (a), 4-mm-thick images (b), and virtual thin-slice images (c). Multiple compression fractures are seen in the thoracic and lumbar spine. The fracture of the 10th thoracic vertebra can be seen on the reconstruction from 1-mm-thick images (arrow), and is also identifiable on that from the 4-mm-thick images. However, it is barely visible on that from the virtual thin-slice image, and is therefore difficult to diagnose.
Figure 5
Figure 5
JAFROC curves for Reader 1 (a) and Reader 2 (b). The figure of merit was significantly higher for thick-slice images than for virtual thin-slice images for Reader 1 (P = 0.02).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ji H, McTavish JD, Mortele KJ, Wiesner W, Ros PR. Hepatic imaging with multidetector CT. Radiographics. 2001;21:S71–80. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.21.suppl_1.g01oc04s71. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Crim JR, Tripp D. Multidetector CT of the spine. Semin. Ultrasound. CT. MR. 2004;25:55–66. doi: 10.1053/j.sult.2003.11.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wintermark M, et al. Thoracolumbar spine fractures in patients who have sustained severe trauma: Depiction with multi-detector row CT. Radiology. 2003;227:681–689. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2273020592. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wataya T, Nakanishi K, Suzuki Y, Kido S, Tomiyama N. Introduction to deep learning: Minimum essence required to launch a research. Jpn. J. Radiol. 2020;38:907–921. doi: 10.1007/s11604-020-00998-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barat M, et al. Artificial intelligence: A critical review of current applications in pancreatic imaging. Jpn. J. Radiol. 2021;39:514–523. doi: 10.1007/s11604-021-01098-5. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms