Primary care physician referral practices regarding BRCA1/2 genetic counseling in a major health system
- PMID: 35842521
- DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06523-5
Primary care physician referral practices regarding BRCA1/2 genetic counseling in a major health system
Abstract
Purpose: The United States Preventive Services Task Force recommends primary care physicians refer patients at high risk for BRCA1/2 mutations to genetic testing when appropriate. The objective of our study was to describe referrals for BRCA1/2 testing in a large integrated health system and to assess factors associated with referral.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study includes female patients between 18 and 50 years who had a primary care visit in the Cleveland Clinic Health System between 2010 and 2019. We used multivariable logistic regression to estimate differences in the odds of a woman being referred for BRCA1/2 testing by patient factors and referring physician specialty. We also assessed variation in referrals by physicians.
Results: Among 279,568 women, 5% were high risk. Of those, 22% were referred for testing. Black patients were significantly less likely to be referred than white patients (aOR 0.87; 95% CI 0.77, 0.98) and Jewish patients were more likely to be referred than non-Jewish patients (aOR 2.13; 95% CI 1.68, 2.70). Patients primarily managed by OB/GYN were significantly more likely to be referred than those cared for via Internal/Family Medicine (aOR 1.45; 95% CI 1.30, 1.61). Less than a quarter of primary care physicians ever referred a patient for testing.
Conclusion: The majority of primary care patients at high risk for a BRCA1/2 mutation were not referred for testing, and over a decade, most physicians never referred a single patient. Internal/Family Medicine physicians, in particular, need support in identifying and referring women who could benefit from testing.
Keywords: BRCA1; BRCA2; Breast cancer; Genetic counseling; Genetic testing.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Chen S, Parmigiani G (2007) Meta-analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 penetrance. J Clin Oncol 25:1329. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2006.09.1066 - DOI - PubMed
-
- PDQ® Cancer Genetics Editorial Board. PDQ Genetics of Breast and Gynecologic Cancers. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute. Updated 04/20/22. Available at: https://www.cancer.gov/types/breast/hp/breast-ovarian-genetics-pdq . Accessed 31 Jan 2020
-
- Garcia C, Wendt J, Lyon L et al (2014) Risk management options elected by women after testing positive for a BRCA mutation. Gynecol Oncol 132:428–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.YGYNO.2013.12.014 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Archived: breast and ovarian cancer: BRCA genetic testing, september 2005 | United States preventive services taskforce. https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/brea... . Accessed 7 Dec 2021
-
- Owens DK, Davidson KW, Krist AH et al (2019) Risk assessment, genetic counseling, and genetic testing for BRCA -related cancer: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. JAMA 322:652–665. https://doi.org/10.1001/JAMA.2019.10987 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
