Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2022 Jul 16;23(1):51.
doi: 10.1186/s40360-022-00585-3.

Real-world safety of ulinastatin: a post-marketing surveillance of 11,252 patients in China

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Real-world safety of ulinastatin: a post-marketing surveillance of 11,252 patients in China

Jin Li et al. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. .

Abstract

Background: The safety assessment of ulinastatin can guide clinical practice. The present study aimed to investigate the real-world safety of ulinastatin in China.

Methods: This multicenter study retrospectively analyzed the post-marketing surveillance data of consecutive patients treated with ulinastatin between August 2014 and June 2017 in the general wards and the intensive care units (ICU) of nine hospitals in China. Adverse drug reactions/adverse drug events (ADRs/ADEs) were collected and evaluated in a post-marketing database.

Results: A total of 11,252 consecutive patients were included in the study: 7009 ICU patients and 4243 general ward patients. Eleven patients with ADRs/ADEs were observed, including nine ICU patients and two general ward patients. The clinical manifestations were liver dysfunction (n = 5 ICU cases, n = 1 general case), thrombocytopenia (n = 2 ICU cases, n = 1 general case), leukopenia (n = 1 ICU case), and rash (n = 1 ICU case). During the study period, the drug ADR/ADE rate of ulinastatin injection was 0.98‰ (11/11,252 × 1000‰). Among the 11,252 valid patients, only 327 received ulinastatin in accordance with the drug specifications. After excluding unreasonable drug use, the calculated ADR rate was 3.06‰ (1/327 × 1000‰) (95% confidence interval: 0.0‰-17.1‰). In ICU and general ward patients, the use of other drugs combined with ulinastatin was associated with the occurrence of ADRs/ADEs (100% with ADRs/ADEs vs. 0% in controls, P < 0.001).

Conclusions: The incidence of ADRs/ADEs of ulinastatin is < 5‰. The ADRs/ADEs involved limited organs, mainly the skin, gastrointestinal tract, and blood. In most cases, the ADRs/ADEs gradually alleviated or recovered after drug withdrawal. The inappropriate/off-label use of ulinastatin should be the focus of surveillance.

Keywords: Adverse drug reaction; Phase IV study; Post-marketing reevaluation; Rational drug use; Ulinastatin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cowling BJ, Feng S, Finelli L, Steffens A, Fowlkes A. Assessment of influenza vaccine effectiveness in a sentinel surveillance network 2010-13, United States. Vaccine. 2016;34:61–66. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.11.016. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thomas RE, Lorenzetti DL, Spragins W, Jackson D, Williamson T. Active and passive surveillance of yellow fever vaccine 17D or 17DD-associated serious adverse events: systematic review. Vaccine. 2011;29:4544–4555. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.04.055. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhao Y, Chen Z, Huang P, Zheng SW, Xu QL, Shi C. Analysis of Ornidazole injection in clinical use at post-marketing stage by centralized hospital monitoring system. Curr Med Sci. 2019;39:836–842. doi: 10.1007/s11596-019-2114-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Leng YX, Yang SG, Song YH, Zhu X, Yao GQ. Ulinastatin for acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Crit Care Med. 2014;3:34–41. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v3.i1.34. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tsujino T, Komatsu Y, Isayama H, Hirano K, Sasahira N, Yamamoto N, et al. Ulinastatin for pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a randomized, controlled trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;3:376–383. doi: 10.1016/S1542-3565(04)00671-8. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types