Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 16;21(1):143.
doi: 10.1186/s12934-022-01873-7.

Targeting IL-6 by engineered Lactococcus lactis via surface-displayed affibody

Affiliations

Targeting IL-6 by engineered Lactococcus lactis via surface-displayed affibody

Abida Zahirović et al. Microb Cell Fact. .

Abstract

Background: Dysregulated production of interleukin (IL)-6 is implicated in the pathology of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Neutralization of IL-6 in the gut by safe probiotic bacteria may help alleviate intestinal inflammation. Here, we developed Lactococcus lactis with potent and selective IL-6 binding activity by displaying IL-6-specific affibody on its surface.

Results: Anti-IL-6 affibody (designated as ZIL) was expressed in fusion with lactococcal secretion peptide Usp45 and anchoring protein AcmA. A high amount of ZIL fusion protein was detected on bacterial surface, and its functionality was validated by confocal microscopy and flow cytometry. Removal of IL-6 from the surrounding medium by the engineered L. lactis was evaluated using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. ZIL-displaying L. lactis sequestered recombinant human IL-6 from the solution in a concentration-dependent manner by up to 99% and showed no binding to other pro-inflammatory cytokines, thus proving to be highly specific for IL-6. The removal was equally efficient across different IL-6 concentrations (150-1200 pg/mL) that were found to be clinically relevant in IBD patients. The ability of engineered bacteria to capture IL-6 from cell culture supernatant was assessed using immunostimulated human monocytic cell lines (THP-1 and U-937) differentiated into macrophage-like cells. ZIL-displaying L. lactis reduced the content of IL-6 in the supernatants of both cell lines in a concentration-dependent manner by up to 94%. Dose response analysis showed that bacterial cell concentrations of 107 and 109 CFU/mL (colony forming units per mL) were required for half-maximal removal of recombinant and macrophage-derived IL-6, respectively.

Conclusion: The ability of ZIL-displaying L. lactis to bind pathological concentrations of IL-6 at common bacterial doses suggests physiological significance.

Keywords: Delivery system; IL-6; Inflammatory bowel disease; Lactococcus lactis; Microbiota.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
IL-6 binding affibody ZIL is expressed in L. lactis. a Gene constructs for expression of IL-6 binding affibody ZIL on the surface of L. lactis. USP, gene encoding Usp45 secretion signal (84 bp). ZIL, gene encoding IL-6-binding affibody (174 bp). Flag, epitope tag sequence. AcmA, gene encoding C-terminal domain of AcmA anchoring protein (642 bp). The arrow represents the nisin-inducible promoter. b Coomassie brilliant blue-stained SDS-PAGE gel (left) and Western blot analysis (right) of whole lysates of L. lactis harbouring plasmids pSD-ZIL or pSD-ZIL-flag. Cont., L. lactis containing empty plasmid pNZ8148. Bands representing untagged or flag-tagged ZIL fusion protein are indicated with arrows
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
IL-6-binding affibody ZIL is displayed on L. lactis surface. a Representative confocal immunofluorescence microscopy images visualizing ZIL-flag at the bacterial surface and b flow cytometry analysis showing a large increase in mean fluorescence intensity and a shift of the population of ZIL-flag-expressing L. lactis compared to control bacterial cells. ZIL-flag, L. lactis harbouring pSD-ZIL-flag plasmid. Cont., L. lactis harbouring empty plasmid pNZ8148. Engineered bacteria were incubated with an anti-flag antibody and then probed with Alexa Fluor 488 or Alexa Fluor 555-conjugated secondary antibody. The results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three individual measurements. ***, P < 0.001 (unpaired t-test). a: Bright-field images (left) and the corresponding fluorescence images (right). Bar scale 20 µm. b: MFI, mean fluorescence intensity
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Surface-displayed IL-6-binding affibody ZIL is functional. Representative confocal immunofluorescence microscopy images (a) and flow cytometric analysis (b) showing binding of ZIL-flag-displaying L. lactis to human biotin-conjugated IL-6. ZIL-flag., L. lactis cells containing pSD-ZIL-flag plasmid. Cont., L. lactis control cells containing empty plasmid pNZ8148. Control or ZIL-flag-displaying L. lactis cells were incubated with IL-6-biotin and detected with an anti-biotin antibody, followed by a secondary antibody conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488. The results are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three individual measurements. ***, P < 0.001 (unpaired t-test). a: Bright-field images (left) and the corresponding fluorescence images (right). Bar scale 20 µm. b: MFI, mean fluorescence intensity
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
ZIL-displaying L. lactis removes various amounts of recombinant IL-6 from the solution in a concentration-dependent manner. ELISA-determined concentrations of recombinant IL-6 that remained in the solution following incubation with ZIL-displaying L. lactis (3 × 106–6 × 109 CFU/mL) across four concentrations of recombinant IL-6 (150, 300, 600 and 1200 pg/mL) that were spiked into the PBS buffer (left). ZIL., L. lactis cells containing pSD-ZIL plasmid. Cont., L. lactis control cells containing empty plasmid pNZ8148. Dose response curves for calculating the concentration of ZIL-displaying bacterial cells necessary to remove a 50% of recombinant IL-6 from the solution (half-maximal effective concentration, EC50) determined by curve fitting with four parameters logistic (4 PL) regression model in GraphPad Prism (right). The results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three individual measurements. **, P ≤ 0.006; ***, P < 0.001 (unpaired t-test)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
ZIL-displaying L. lactis does not bind TNF, IL-17, IL-23 or IL-8. ELISA-determined concentration of recombinant TNF (a), IL-17 (b), IL-23 (c), IL-8 (d) that remained in the solution following their incubation with increasing concentrations of ZIL-displaying L. lactis (ZIL). Cont., L. lactis control cells containing empty plasmid pNZ8148. The experiments are performed in triplicate. Data are means ± standard deviation (SD)
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
ZIL-displaying L. lactis does not cross-react with mouse IL-6. ELISA-determined concentration of recombinant mouse IL-6 that remained in the solution following incubation with increasing concentrations of ZIL-displaying L. lactis (ZIL) and ZIL-flag-displaying L. lactis (ZIL-flag). Cont., L. lactis control cells containing empty plasmid pNZ8148. EVA-flag, L. lactis control cells containing pSD-EVA-flag plasmid. ZHER-flag, L. lactis control cells containing pSD-ZHER-flag plasmid. The experiment is performed in triplicate. Data are means ± standard deviation (SD)
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
ZIL-displaying L. lactis removes IL-6 secreted by differentiated THP-1 and differentiated U-937 cells in proportion to the concentration of bacterial cells. ELISA-determined concentrations of IL-6 that remained in the supernatants of LPS-induced differentiated THP-1 cells (a) and differentiated U-937 cells (b) following incubation with ZIL-displaying L. lactis (ZIL). Cont., L. lactis control cells containing empty plasmid pNZ8148. Untr., untreated supernatants. Dose response curves for calculating the concentration of ZIL-displaying L. lactis cells necessary for removal of a 50% of IL-6 from the cell culture supernatants (EC50, half-maximal effective concentration) was determined by curve fitting using four parameters logistic (4 PL) regression model in GraphPad Prism (c). The results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) of experiments performed in triplicate. **, P ≤ 0.007; ***, P < 0.001 (unpaired t-test)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Atreya R, Neurath MF. Involvement of IL-6 in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease and colon cancer. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2005;28:187–196. doi: 10.1385/CRIAI:28:3:187. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Neurath MF. Cytokines in inflammatory bowel disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2014;14:329–342. doi: 10.1038/nri3661. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ding NS, Hart A, De Cruz P. Systematic review: predicting and optimising response to anti-TNF therapy in Crohn's disease—algorithm for practical management. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2016;43:30–51. doi: 10.1111/apt.13445. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hueber W, Sands BE, Lewitzky S, Vandemeulebroecke M, Reinisch W, Higgins PD, et al. Secukinumab, a human anti-IL-17A monoclonal antibody, for moderate to severe Crohn's disease: unexpected results of a randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Gut. 2012;61:1693–1700. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301668. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Reinisch W, Hommes DW, Van Assche G, Colombel JF, Gendre JP, Oldenburg B, et al. A dose escalating, placebo controlled, double blind, single dose and multidose, safety and tolerability study of fontolizumab, a humanised anti-interferon gamma antibody, in patients with moderate to severe Crohn's disease. Gut. 2006;55:1138–1144. doi: 10.1136/gut.2005.079434. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources