Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug:82:104166.
doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104166. Epub 2022 Jul 15.

HDL cholesterol levels and susceptibility to COVID-19

Affiliations

HDL cholesterol levels and susceptibility to COVID-19

Vignesh Chidambaram et al. EBioMedicine. 2022 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Host cell-membrane cholesterol, an important player in viral infections, is in constant interaction with serum high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C). Low serum lipid levels during hospital admission are associated with COVID-19 severity. However, the effect of antecedent serum lipid levels on SARS-CoV-2 infection risk has not been explored.

Methods: From our retrospective cohort from the Arkansas Clinical Data-Repository, we used log-binomial regression to assess the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection among the trajectories of lipid levels during the 2 years antecedent to COVID-19 testing, identified using group-based-trajectory modelling. We used mixed-effects linear regression to assess the serum lipid level trends followed up to the time of, and 2-months following COVID-19 testing.

Findings: Among the 11001 individuals with a median age of 59 years (IQR 46-70), 1340 (12.2%) tested positive for COVID-19. The highest trajectory for antecedent serum HDL-C was associated with the lowest SARS-CoV-2 infection risk (RR 0.63, 95%CI 0.46-0.86). Antecedent serum LDL-C, total cholesterol (TC), and triglycerides (TG) were not independently associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection risk. In COVID-19 patients, serum HDL-C (-7.7, 95%CI -9.8 to -5.5 mg/dL), and LDL-C (-6.29, 95%CI -12.2 to -0.37 mg/dL), but not TG levels, decreased transiently at the time of testing.

Interpretation: Higher antecedent serum HDL-C, but not LDL-C, TC, or TG, levels were associated with a lower SARS-CoV-2 infection risk. Serum HDL-C, and LDL-C levels declined transiently at the time of infection. Further studies are needed to determine the potential role of lipid-modulating therapies in the prevention and management of COVID-19.

Funding: Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number UL1 TR003107.

Keywords: LDL; Risk; SARS-CoV-2; Total cholesterol; Triglycerides.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests We declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of the individuals included in the study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Trajectories of LDL-C, HDL-C, TC and TG levels during the two years antecedent to COVID-19 testing using group-based trajectory modelling (GBTM) and COVID-19 related outcomes. The first row (a, e) corresponds to LDL-C; second row (b, f) to HDL-C; third row (c, g) to TC, and fourth row (d, h) to TG. Low, medium, and high trajectories are represented by numbers 1,2, and 3, respectively. The left panel (a-d) presents the trajectories of lipid levels during the past two years over the eight 3-month time periods before COVID-19 testing (X-axis). The right panel (e-h) presents the outcomes in patients in each of the trajectories: the five outcomes represented are i) not infected (COVID-19 negative), ii) infected (COVID-19 positive) but not requiring admission, iii) admitted with non-severe COVID-19, iv) admitted with severe COVID-19 but survived and v) in-hospital death. Patients in the trajectories 2 and 3 of HDL-C had higher proportion of patients with negative COVID-19 tests.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Coefficient plot for the association of antecedent lipid levels with the probability of testing positive for COVID-19. There is an inverse relationship between antecedent HDL-C levels and the probability of testing positive for COVID-19 (panel b). LDL-C (panel a) and TG (panel c) did not have a relationship with the probability of testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection [Pr (COVID test=1)]. The solid lines (—) represent the coefficient plot and the dashed lines (- -) represent the 95% confidence intervals. The p-values are calculated based on log-binomial regression.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Serum lipid levels before, at the time of, and after COVID-19 testing with trends assessed using mixed-effects linear regression analysis. Antecedent to COVID-19 testing (N=9202) (730 days to 14 days prior to COVID-19 testing), HDL-C was significantly lower in the COVID-19 positive group, while antecedent LDL-C and TG were not different. At the time of testing (N=1886) (within 14 days before or after COVID-19 testing), LDL-C (panel a), and HDL-C levels (panel b) were significantly lower in COVID-19 positive patients while TG levels (panel c) were similar across the two groups. The median duration of follow-up subsequent to COVID testing is 261 (IQR 115 to 395) days. After 60 days follow-up post testing (N=2198), LDL-C, HDL-C and TG levels returned to nearly pre-infection levels among COVID-19 patients who survived.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Summary of Results. The top panel - association of antecedent lipid levels with the risk of COVID-19. The middle panel - subgroup analysis of the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection for the 3 trajectories of HDL-C among the 3 trajectories of LDL-C. The bottom panel shows the trends in lipid levels during and after COVID-19.

References

    1. Singanayagam A, Hakki S, Dunning J, et al. Community transmission and viral load kinetics of the SARS-CoV-2 delta (B.1.617.2) variant in vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals in the UK: a prospective, longitudinal, cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022;22(2):183–195. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00648-4. http://www.thelancet.com/article/S1473309921006484/fulltext [cited 2022 Jan 19]. Available from: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Woolf SH, Chapman DA, Lee JH. COVID-19 as the Leading cause of death in the United States. JAMA. 2021;325(2):123–124. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2774465 [cited 2022 Jan 19]. Available from: - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chidambaram V, Tun NL, Haque WZ, et al. Factors associated with disease severity and mortality among patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2020;15(11):e0241541. [cited 2021 May 28]. Available from: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241541 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Williamson EJ, Walker AJ, Bhaskaran K, et al. Factors associated with COVID-19-related death using OpenSAFELY. Nature. 2020;584(7821):430–436. http://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2521-4 Available from: - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ference BA, Ginsberg HN, Graham I, et al. Low-density lipoproteins cause atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. 1. Evidence from genetic, epidemiologic, and clinical studies. A consensus statement from the European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel. Eur Heart J. 2017;38(32):2459–2472. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/38/32/2459/3745109 Available from: - PMC - PubMed