Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2022 Jun;9(2):150-154.
doi: 10.15441/ceem.20.052. Epub 2022 Jun 30.

Concomitant intravascular and extravascular obstructive shock: a case report of cardiac angiosarcoma presenting with pericardial tamponade

Affiliations
Case Reports

Concomitant intravascular and extravascular obstructive shock: a case report of cardiac angiosarcoma presenting with pericardial tamponade

Mor Zuler et al. Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2022 Jun.

Abstract

Atraumatic pericardial tamponade and intracardiac masses are both recognized etiologies of acute obstructive shock. Pericardial tamponade, is a cardiovascular emergency commonly considered by emergency physicians and, as a result, evaluation for this process has been incorporated into standardized point of care ultrasound algorithms for assessing hypotension. Obstructive shock secondary to intracardiac tumors is an atypical clinical presentation, and although it is evaluated by the same ultrasound imaging modality, it is generally not considered or evaluated for in the emergency department setting. The concomitant presentation of these two pathologic processes is an extremely rare oncologic emergency. Existing literature on the subject is found in a small number of case reports with nearly no prior descriptions in emergency medicine references. In the right clinical context this unique presentation should be considered and evaluated for in the emergency department via point of care ultrasound modality to help guide in the management of the resulting obstructive shock.

Keywords: Case report; Critical care; Emergency medicine; Resuscitation; Shock.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Electrocardiogram prior to pericardiocentesis demonstrating both low voltage and tachycardia.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Chest X-ray demonstrating "water-bottle" heart suggestive of pericardial effusion.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
The 5×5-right atrial mass (black arrow) extending into the vena cava (white arrowhead). Left ventricular wall (white arrow) and pericardial lining (black arrowhead) also associated with a large pericardial effusion (asterisk).
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Electrocardiogram following pericardiocentesis demonstrating low voltage but marked improvement of tachycardia.

Similar articles

References

    1. Perera P, Mailhot T, Riley D, Mandavia D. The RUSH exam: Rapid Ultrasound in SHock in the evaluation of the critically lll. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2010;28:29–56. - PubMed
    1. Blaivas M. Incidence of pericardial effusion in patients presenting to the emergency department with unexplained dyspnea. Acad Emerg Med. 2001;8:1143–6. - PubMed
    1. Dermawan JK, Policarpio-Nicolas ML. Malignancies in pleural, peritoneal, and pericardial effusions. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2020;144:1086–91. - PubMed
    1. Kurian KC, Weisshaar D, Parekh H, Berry GJ, Reitz B. Primary cardiac angiosarcoma: case report and review of the literature. Cardiovasc Pathol. 2006;15:110–2. - PubMed
    1. Oshima K, Ohtaki A, Kano M, et al. Primary cardiac angiosarcoma associated with cardiac tamponade: case report. Jpn Circ J. 1999;63:822–4. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources