Impact of bisphosphonate drugs on dental implant healing and peri-implant hard and soft tissues: a systematic review
- PMID: 35843929
- PMCID: PMC9288700
- DOI: 10.1186/s12903-022-02330-y
Impact of bisphosphonate drugs on dental implant healing and peri-implant hard and soft tissues: a systematic review
Abstract
Objective: Implantology represents the gold standard for oral rehabilitation, unfortunately, often, despite there are no local contraindications to this type of rehabilitation, there are uncertainties regarding the general health of our patients. Many patients nowadays take bisphosphonate drugs, often without first seeking advice from an oral surgeon or a dentist. The purpose of this review is precisely to highlight any contraindications to this type of treatment reported in the literature, in patients who take or have taken bisphosphonate drugs.
Methods: For this study the scientific information sources were consulted using as search terms "("bisphosphonate AND "dental implant")", obtaining 312 results, these were subsequently skimmed according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and further evaluated their relevance to the study and the presence of requested outcomes.
Results: Only 9 manuscripts (RCTs, Multicentric studies and Clinical Trials) were included in this review, as they respected the parameters of this review, they were analyzed and it was possible to draw important results from them. Surely from this study it is understood that the use of bisphosphonate drugs does not represent an absolute contraindication to implant therapy, it is evident how adequate pharmacological prophylaxis, and an adequate protocol reduce the risks regarding implant failures. Furthermore, the values of marginal bone loss over time seem, even if not statistically significant, to be better in implant rehabilitation with bisphosphonate drugs association. Only a few molecules like risedronate, or corticosteroids, or some conditions like smoking or diabetes have shown a high risk of surgical failure.
Conclusion: Although this study considered different studies for a total of 378 patients and at least 1687 different dental implants, showing better results in some cases for dental implant therapy in cases of bisphosphonate intake, further clinical, randomized and multicentric studies are needed, with longer follow-ups, to fully clarify this situation which often negatively affects the quality of life of our patients and places clinicians in the face of doubts.
Keywords: Bisphosphonate; Bone tissue; Dental implant; Oral surgery; Osseointegration; Osteoporosis.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
No conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Outcomes of placing dental implants in patients taking oral bisphosphonates: a review of 115 cases.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Feb;66(2):223-30. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2007.09.019. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008. PMID: 18201600
-
Impact of bisphosphonate therapy on dental implant outcomes: An overview of systematic review evidence.Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Mar;48(3):373-381. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2018.09.006. Epub 2018 Oct 9. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019. PMID: 30314708 Review.
-
Characteristics of implant failures in patients with a history of oral bisphosphonate therapy.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Mar;68(3):508-14. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.09.055. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010. PMID: 20171469
-
The effect of antiresorptive drugs on implant therapy: Systematic review and meta-analysis.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29 Suppl 18:54-92. doi: 10.1111/clr.13282. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018. PMID: 30306695
-
The nature and frequency of bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaws in dental implant patients: a South Australian case series.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Feb;68(2):337-43. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.09.037. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010. PMID: 20116705
Cited by
-
Zirconia Dental Implant Designs and Surface Modifications: A Narrative Review.Materials (Basel). 2024 Aug 25;17(17):4202. doi: 10.3390/ma17174202. Materials (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39274592 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinical study to assess influence of immediate provisionalization and various implant morphologies on implant stability: A prospective clinical study.Front Surg. 2023 Jan 6;9:1095741. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1095741. eCollection 2022. Front Surg. 2023. PMID: 36684336 Free PMC article.
-
How far can we go? A 20-year meta-analysis of dental implant survival rates.Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Sep 21;28(10):541. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05929-3. Clin Oral Investig. 2024. PMID: 39305362 Free PMC article.
-
Dental Implant Placement in Medically Compromised Patients: A Literature Review.Cureus. 2024 Feb 14;16(2):e54199. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54199. eCollection 2024 Feb. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 38496195 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Bone Metabolism and Dental Implant Insertion as a Correlation Affecting on Marginal Bone Remodeling: Texture Analysis and the New Corticalization Index, Predictor of Marginal Bone Loss-3 Months of Follow-Up.J Clin Med. 2024 May 30;13(11):3212. doi: 10.3390/jcm13113212. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38892923 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Norcia A, Cicciù M, Matacena G, Bramanti E. Dental implant positioning by using the root way. A predictable technique for postextractive surgery. Minerva Stomatologica. 2016;65(6):393–402. - PubMed
-
- Cicciù M, Cervino G, Terranova A, Risitano G, Raffaele M, Cucinotta F, Santonocito D, Fiorillo L. Prosthetic and mechanical parameters of the facial bone under the load of different dental implant shapes: a parametric study. Prosthesis. 2019;66:41–53. doi: 10.3390/prosthesis1010006. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources