Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2022 Sep;47(5):711-723.
doi: 10.1007/s13318-022-00773-w. Epub 2022 Jul 18.

Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Lucitanib in Patients with Advanced Cancer

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Lucitanib in Patients with Advanced Cancer

Mingxiang Liao et al. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2022 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Lucitanib is an oral, potent, selective inhibitor of the tyrosine kinase activity of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1‒3, fibroblast growth factor receptors 1‒3, and platelet-derived growth factor receptors alpha/beta.

Objective: We aimed to develop a population pharmacokinetics (PopPK) model for lucitanib in patients with advanced cancers.

Methods: PopPK analyses were based on intensive and sparse oral pharmacokinetic data from 5 phase 1/2 clinical studies of lucitanib in a total of 403 patients with advanced cancers. Lucitanib was administered at 5‒30 mg daily doses as 1 of 2 immediate-release oral formulations: a film-coated tablet or a hard gelatin capsule.

Results: Lucitanib pharmacokinetics were best described by a 2-compartment model with zero-order release into the dosing compartment, followed by first-order absorption and first-order elimination. Large between-subject pharmacokinetic variability was partially explained by body weight. No effects of demographics or tumor type on lucitanib pharmacokinetics were observed. The model suggested that the formulation impacted release duration (tablet, 0.243 h; capsule, 0.814 h), but the effect was not considered clinically meaningful. No statistically significant effects were detected for concomitant cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 inhibitors or inducers, CYP2C8 or P-glycoprotein inhibitors, serum albumin, mild/moderate renal impairment, or mild hepatic impairment. Concomitant proton pump inhibitors had no clinically significant effect on lucitanib absorption.

Conclusions: The PopPK model adequately described lucitanib pharmacokinetics. High between-subject pharmacokinetic variability supports a safety-based dose-titration strategy currently being used in an ongoing clinical study of lucitanib to optimize drug exposure and clinical benefit.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01283945, NCT02053636, ISRCTN23201971, NCT02202746, NCT02109016.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Mingxiang Liao, Kenton Wride, Denise Lepley, Terri Cameron, and Jim Xiao are or were employees of Clovis Oncology, Inc. Mark Sale and Jie Zhou are or were paid consultants for Clovis Oncology, Inc.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PopPK model structure. The pharmacokinetics of lucitanib were described by a 2-compartment linear model with a zero-order release into the dosing compartment, followed by first-order absorption and first-order elimination. Volume (Vc, Vp) and clearance (Q, CL) terms were proportional to Weightexponent (a power model of weight with exponents fixed to 1 for volume terms and 0.75 for clearance terms). Duration of release from the tablet formulation (0.243 h) differed from the capsule (0.814 h). CL clearance, Ka first-order absorption rate constant, PopPK population pharmacokinetics, Q intercompartmental clearance, Vc central volume, Vp peripheral volume
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Goodness-of-fit plots for the final lucitanib PopPK model. a Population prediction (ETA = 0) versus observed; b individual prediction (ETA ≠ 0) versus observed; c prediction versus conditional weighted residual; and d time versus conditional weighted residual. Blue lines indicate smoothed means (locally estimated scatterplot smoothing, LOESS [34]). Black trend lines indicate lines of unity (intercept = 0, slope = 1). Observations (concentrations or residuals, black dots) from the same individual are connected by black lines. ETA random effects values for pharmacokinetic parameters, PopPK population pharmacokinetics
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Visual predictive check for the final lucitanib PopPK model: time since first dose versus lucitanib concentration. PopPK population pharmacokinetics
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Conditional weighted residuals by formulation. Black horizontal lines represent median values, and boxes correspond to the ranges of the first and third quartiles. Upper and lower whiskers extend from the box to the largest or smallest value, respectively, within 1.5 times the interquartile range. Observations outside the whisker range are represented as dots
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Post hoc estimates of BSV of Ka by formulation. Black horizontal lines represent median values, and boxes correspond to the ranges of the first and third quartiles. Upper and lower whiskers extend from the box to the largest or smallest value, respectively, within 1.5 times the interquartile range. Observations outside the whisker range are represented as dots. BSV between-subject variability, ETA random effects values for pharmacokinetic parameters, Ka first-order absorption rate constant
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Post hoc estimates of BSV of CL/F by formulation. Black horizontal lines represent median values, and boxes correspond to the ranges of the first and third quartiles. Upper and lower whiskers extend from the box to the largest or smallest value, respectively, within 1.5 times the interquartile range. Observations outside the whisker range are represented as dots. BSV between-subject variability, CL/F apparent clearance, ETA random effects values for pharmacokinetic parameters

References

    1. Sherwood LM, Parris EE, Folkman J. Tumor angiogenesis: therapeutic implications. N Engl J Med. 1971;285:1182–1186. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197111182852108. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lugano R, Ramachandran M, Dimberg A. Tumor angiogenesis: causes, consequences, challenges and opportunities. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2020;77:1745–1770. doi: 10.1007/s00018-019-03351-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dusek RL, Robillard L, Harding TC, Simmons AD, Nguyen M. Abstract 1214: enhancement of anti-PD-1 antitumor efficacy in syngenic preclinical models by the angiogenesis inhibitor lucitanib. Cancer Res. 2019;79:1214. doi: 10.1158/1538-7445.AM2019-1214. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Guffanti F, Chilà R, Bello E, Zucchetti M, Zangarini M, Ceriani L, et al. In vitro and in vivo activity of lucitanib in FGFR1/2 amplified or mutated cancer models. Neoplasia. 2017;19:35–42. doi: 10.1016/j.neo.2016.11.008. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Soria J, De Braud F, Cereda R, Bahleda R, Delmonte A, Angevin E, et al. First-in-man study of E-3810, a novel VEGFR and FGFR inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:TPS149. doi: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.15_suppl.tps149. - DOI

Publication types

Associated data