Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 13;50(9):1248-1255.
doi: 10.1515/jpm-2022-0202. Print 2022 Nov 25.

Neonatal admission rate after vaginal breech delivery

Anne Dathan-Stumpf  1 , Christina Hausmann  1 , Ulrich Thome  2 , Holger Stepan  1
Affiliations

Neonatal admission rate after vaginal breech delivery

Anne Dathan-Stumpf et al. J Perinat Med. .

Abstract

Objectives: The safest mode of delivery for fetuses in breech presentations is still an ongoing debate. The aim of this study was to analyze neonatal admission rates after vaginal breech delivery and compare it to other modes of delivery in order to counsel pregnant women with breech presentation adequately.

Methods: We performed a retrospective monocentric analysis of all deliveries with singleton pregnancies in breech presentation > 36.0 weeks of gestation between 01/2018-12/2019. Short-term neonatal morbidity data was collected for vaginal delivery and primary as well as secondary cesarean sections from breech presentations.

Results: A total of n=41/482 (8.5%) neonates had to be admitted to NICU: vaginal breech delivery n=18/153 (11.8%), primary cesarean section n=9/101 (8.9%, OR 0.73; CI 0.32-1.70; p=0.47), secondary cesarean section n=10/76 (13.2%, OR 1.14; CI 0.50-2.60, p=0.76) and vaginal vertex delivery n=4/152 (2.6%, OR 0.20; CI 0.06-0.51; p=0.005). There was no significant difference in transfer to NICU between all breech position delivery modes. Despite significantly lower pH and 5' APGAR values after vaginal delivery, neonates delivered by primary cesarean section and NICU admission had to be treated there significantly longer (mean 80.9 vs. 174.0 h). No significant difference in terms of ventilation parameters and infections were found between the vaginal delivery, primary and secondary cesarean section from breech presentation.

Conclusions: Vaginal breech delivery does not result in a higher neonatal admission rate in comparison to primary and secondary section. In contrast, there is a shorter NICU duration in case of neonatal admission after vaginal delivery.

Keywords: breech presentation; delivery mode; neonatal short-term outcome; vaginal delivery.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe e.V. Sectio caesarea: S3-Leitlinie. AWMF-registernummer 015–084; 2020. Available from: https://www.awmf.org/uploads/tx_szleitlinien/015-084l_S3_Sectio-caesarea....
    1. Hannah, ME, Hannah, WJ, Hewson, SA, Hodnett, ED, Saigal, S, Willan, AR. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet 2000;356:1375–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02840-3.
    1. Hogle, KL, Kilburn, L, Hewson, S, Gafni, A, Wall, R, Hannah, ME. Impact of the international term breech trial on clinical practice and concerns: a survey of centre collaborators. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2003;25:14–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1701-2163(16)31077-5.
    1. Hofmeyr, GJ, Hannah, M, Lawrie, TA. Planned caesarean section for term breech delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;2015:CD000166.
    1. Goffinet, F, Carayol, M, Foidart, JM, Alexander, S, Uzan, S, Subtil, D, et al.. Is planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term still an option? Results of an observational prospective survey in France and Belgium. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;194:1002–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2005.10.817.

LinkOut - more resources