Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 30:16:898800.
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.898800. eCollection 2022.

Typical and Atypical Development of Visual Expertise for Print as Indexed by the Visual Word N1 (N170w): A Systematic Review

Affiliations

Typical and Atypical Development of Visual Expertise for Print as Indexed by the Visual Word N1 (N170w): A Systematic Review

Kathleen Kay Amora et al. Front Neurosci. .

Abstract

The visual word N1 (N170w) is an early brain ERP component that has been found to be a neurophysiological marker for print expertise, which is a prelexical requirement associated with reading development. To date, no other review has assimilated existing research on reading difficulties and atypical development of processes reflected in the N170w response. Hence, this systematic review synthesized results and evaluated neurophysiological and experimental procedures across different studies about visual print expertise in reading development. Literature databases were examined for relevant studies from 1995 to 2020 investigating the N170w response in individuals with or without reading disorders. To capture the development of the N170w related to reading, results were compared between three different age groups: pre-literate children, school-aged children, and young adults. The majority of available N170w studies (N = 69) investigated adults (n = 31) followed by children (school-aged: n = 21; pre-literate: n = 4) and adolescents (n = 1) while some studies investigated a combination of these age groups (n = 12). Most studies were conducted with German-speaking populations (n = 17), followed by English (n = 15) and Chinese (n = 14) speaking participants. The N170w was primarily investigated using a combination of words, pseudowords, and symbols (n = 20) and mostly used repetition-detection (n = 16) or lexical-decision tasks (n = 16). Different studies posed huge variability in selecting electrode sites for analysis; however, most focused on P7, P8, and O1 sites of the international 10-20 system. Most of the studies in adults have found a more negative N170w in controls than poor readers, whereas in children, the results have been mixed. In typical readers, N170w ranged from having a bilateral distribution to a left-hemispheric dominance throughout development, whereas in young, poor readers, the response was mainly right-lateralized and then remained in a bilateral distribution. Moreover, the N170w latency has varied according to age group, with adults having an earlier onset yet with shorter latency than school-aged and pre-literate children. This systematic review provides a comprehensive picture of the development of print expertise as indexed by the N170w across age groups and reading abilities and discusses theoretical and methodological differences and challenges in the field, aiming to guide future research.

Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021228444.

Keywords: N170; developmental reading disorder (DRD); dyslexia; event-related potentials (ERP); reading development; systematic review; visual expertise; words.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow diagram of the article search, screening, and selection methods. Design adapted from Page et al. (2021).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distribution of included studies across publication years.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Araújo S., Bramão I., Faísca L., Petersson K. M., Reis A. (2012). Electrophysiological correlates of impaired reading in dyslexic pre-adolescent children. Brain Cogn. 79, 79–88. 10.1016/j.bandc.2012.02.010 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Araújo S., Faísca L., Bramão I., Reis A., Petersson K. M. (2015). Lexical and sublexical orthographic processing: an ERP study with skilled and dyslexic adult readers. Brain Lang. 141, 16–27. 10.1016/j.bandl.2014.11.007 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arns M., Peters S., Breteler R., Verhoeven L. (2007). Different brain activation patterns in dyslexic children: evidence from EEG power and coherence patterns for the double-deficit theory of dyslexia. J. Integr. Neurosci. 6, 175–190. 10.1142/S0219635207001404 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bakos S., Landerl K., Bartling J., Schulte-Körne G., Moll K. (2018). Neurophysiological correlates of word processing deficits in isolated reading and isolated spelling disorders. Clin. Neurophysiol. 129, 526–540. 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.12.010 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barber H. A., Kutas M. (2006). Interplay between computational models and cognitive electrophysiology in visual word recognition. Brain Res. Rev. 53, 98–123. 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2006.07.002 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources