Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jul 12:14:17562872221109022.
doi: 10.1177/17562872221109022. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.

Updates on enhanced recovery after surgery for radical cystectomy

Affiliations
Review

Updates on enhanced recovery after surgery for radical cystectomy

Grace Lee et al. Ther Adv Urol. .

Abstract

Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) is a multimodal pathway that provides evidence-based guidance for improving perioperative care and outcomes in patients undergoing surgery. In 2013, the ERAS society released its original guidelines for radical cystectomy (RC) for bladder cancer (BC), adopting much of its supporting data from colorectal literature. In the last decade, growing interest in ERAS has increased RC-specific ERAS research, including prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Collective data suggest ERAS contributes to improved complication rates, decreased hospital length-of-stay, and/or time to bowel recovery. Various institutions have adopted modified versions of the ERAS pathway, yet there remains a lack of consensus on the efficacy of specific ERAS items and standardization of the protocol. In this review, we summarize updated evidence and practice patterns of ERAS pathways for RC since the introduction of the original 2013 guidelines. Novel target interventions, including use of immunonutrition, prehabilitation, alvimopan, and methods of local analgesia are reviewed. Finally, we discuss barriers to implementing and future steps in advancing the ERAS movement.

Keywords: ERAS; bladder cancer; cystectomy; enhanced recovery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin 2022; 72: 720220112–720220133. - PubMed
    1. Flaig TW, Spiess PE, Agarwal N, et al.. Bladder cancer, version 3.2020, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2020; 18: 329–354. - PubMed
    1. Hu M, Jacobs BL, Montgomery JS. Sharpening the focus on causes and timing of readmission after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Cancer 2014; 120: 1409–1416. - PubMed
    1. Bochner BH, Dalbagni G, Sjoberg DD. Comparing open radical cystectomy and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy: a randomized clinical trial. Euro Urol 2015; 67: 1042–1050. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Krishnan N, Li B, Jacobs BL, et al.. The fate of radical cystectomy patients after hospital discharge: understanding the black box of the pre-readmission interval. Eur Urol Focus 2018; 4: 711–717. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources