Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 15;10(7):E971-E977.
doi: 10.1055/a-1858-3728. eCollection 2022 Jul.

Bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy with a new colonic irrigation device: Results of a prospective observational study

Affiliations

Bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy with a new colonic irrigation device: Results of a prospective observational study

Niels Teich et al. Endosc Int Open. .

Abstract

Background and study aims The success of colonoscopy is mainly dependent on the effectiveness of prior bowel preparation (BP). Patients often consider BP to be the most burdensome part of colonoscopy, which might be a main barrier to the procedure. The aim of this study was to evaluate safety and effectiveness of colonic irrigation with a new colon hydrotherapy (CHT) device as an alternative to traditional oral BP. Patients and methods A prospective, non-randomized observational study was conducted to evaluate the quality of BP. A BP was considered effective if a score of 6 or better through the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) could be reached. Colonoscopy was performed immediately following colonic irrigation. For safety analysis, data on adverse events (AEs) were collected. Among the secondary outcomes, the BBPS assessed in each bowel segment and cecal intubation rate were analyzed. Results Twenty-eight consecutive patients (11 male [39.3%] and 17 [60.7 %] female) undergoing screening/surveillance or diagnostic colonoscopy were enrolled. Mean age was 54 ± 12.4 years (range 19-80). The evaluated mean BBPS was 7.8 ± 1.5. Twenty-five patients (89.3 %) had a BBPS score of 6 or above. Colonic irrigation was performed without any complications and no AEs were reported within 30 days. The cecal intubation rate was 100 %. Conclusions Colonic irrigation with a new CHT device is an effective and low-risk alternative to traditional oral preparation prior to colonoscopy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests The authors received financial remuneration for all study procedures in accordance with the German tariff for doctors (GOÄ) by Herrmann Apparatebau GmbH, Germany.

References

    1. Hassan C, Bretthauer M, Kaminski M F et al. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline. Endoscopy. 2013;45:142–150. - PubMed
    1. Kaminski M F, Thomas-Gibson S, Bugajski M et al. Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative. Endoscopy. 2017;49:378–397. - PubMed
    1. Kastenberg D, Bertiger G, Brogadir S et al. Bowel preparation quality scales for colonoscopy. World J Gastroenterol. 2018;24:2833–2843. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kluge M A, Williams J L, Wu C K et al. Inadequate Boston Bowel Preparation Scale scores predict the risk of missed neoplasia on the next colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:744–751. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rutherford C C, Calderwood A H. Update on bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2018;16:165–181. - PubMed