Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 9:14:465-477.
doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S361886. eCollection 2022.

Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitor Use Among Individuals Age <65 with Type 2 Diabetes and Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Cost-Benefit Analysis

Affiliations

Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitor Use Among Individuals Age <65 with Type 2 Diabetes and Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Cost-Benefit Analysis

Sarah Glover et al. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. .

Abstract

Background: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients face increased risk of heart failure (HF) as they age. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) have demonstrated effectiveness in reducing HF hospitalizations in patients with T2D and HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Diabetes guidelines recommend SGLT-2i therapy for patients with HFrEF; however, SGLT-2i cost is high.

Objective: Study objectives were to assess SGLT-2i utilization and HF hospitalization rates in commercially insured adults (age <65) with T2D and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) taking metformin with/without SGLT-2i use and conduct a cost-benefit analysis of SGLT-2i use from payer and societal perspectives.

Methods: Economic models included HF hospitalization rates from real-world data (RWD) and hospitalization rate reductions from RWD and SGLT-2i clinical trials. Real-world HF hospitalization rates were obtained from claims data (MarketScan Commercial Database, years 2013-2018). Societal perspective analyses included indirect costs. Sensitivity analyses were conducted on key parameters.

Results: Among adults with T2D and HFrEF age 30-64, SGLT-2i use increased (1.1% to 17.4%) between 2013 and 2018. The HF hospitalization rate without SGLT-2i use vs with was 15.5% vs 11.0% (absolute risk reduction of 4.5%). Base case scenario net-benefit was negative across all payer perspective models, while positive for societal-perspective. Payer perspective overall net-benefit in 30-64 population: -$1,725,758 (-$4106 per person). Societal perspective net-benefit in 30-64 population: $5,996,851 ($14,269 per person). In sensitivity analyses, estimated per person base case societal net-benefit of $14,269 was most sensitive to changes in baseline HF hospitalization rates, post-discharge mortality rates, and readmission rates. Lowering SGLT-2i prescription costs 50% and 80% resulted in per person net-benefit increases of $1737 and $4004, respectively.

Conclusion: SGLT-2i utilization has steadily increased, with lower HF hospitalization rates observed among SGLT-2i users. Societal benefits of SGLT-2i use in this population are substantive; payer benefits are negative unless SGLT-2i cost is drastically reduced.

Keywords: cardiovascular disease; cost benefit; economic impact; heart failure; net benefit; type 2 diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Melissa H Roberts reports grants from Sunovion Pharmaceuticals and GlaxoSmithKline and non-financial medical writing support for a journal article from AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. The authors report no other potential conflicts of interest in relation to this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Base case direct net-benefit results by age category. Net-benefit for base case scenario from health care payer perspective. Real-world (RW) and trial model results are reported for ages 30–64. Real-World – solid black, CANVAS – vertical stripe, DELCARE-TIMI – horizontal strip, EMPA-REG – diagonal stripe.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Base case societal net-benefit results by age category. Net-benefit for base case scenario from societal perspective. Real-world (RW) and trial model results are reported for respective age categories and for ages 30–64 combined. Real-World – Grey, CANVAS – purple, DELCARE-TIMI – pink, EMPA-REG – light blue.
Figure 3
Figure 3
MarketScan ages 30–64 societal net-benefit (per person). Results of the one-way sensitivity analysis for CBA societal perspective model using real-world data.

Similar articles

References

    1. National Diabetes Statistics Report 2020. Estimates of diabetes and its burden in the United States; 2020:32.
    1. Zheng Y, Ley SH, Hu FB. Global aetiology and epidemiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its complications. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2018;14(2):88–98. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2017.151 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Seferović PM, Petrie MC, Filippatos GS, et al. Type 2 diabetes mellitus and heart failure: a position statement from the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur J Heart Fail. 2018;20(5):853–872. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1170 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nichols GA, Hillier TA, Erbey JR, Brown JB. Congestive heart failure in type 2 diabetes: prevalence, incidence, and risk factors. Diabetes Care. 2001;24(9):1614–1619. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.9.1614 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Murphy SP, Ibrahim NE, Januzzi JL Jr. Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a review. JAMA. 2020;324(5):488–504. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.10262 - DOI - PubMed