Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 24;8(3):e09170.
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09170. eCollection 2022 Mar.

Academic integrity policies against assessment fraud in postgraduate studies: An analysis of the situation in Spanish universities

Antoni Cerdà-Navarro  1 , Carmen Touza  1 , Mercè Morey-López  1 , Elvira Curiel  2
Affiliations

Academic integrity policies against assessment fraud in postgraduate studies: An analysis of the situation in Spanish universities

Antoni Cerdà-Navarro et al. Heliyon. .

Abstract

We aimed to analyse the strategies and policies of academic integrity in the face of assessment fraud in postgraduate studies in Spain. To this end, we examined the three strategies most commonly used by higher education institutions to address and prevent dishonest behaviour among students: (1) the use of technological mechanisms to detect plagiarism and identity control on assessment tests; (2) regulatory devices and resources (academic regulations and codes of conduct); and (3) training and awareness-raising activities. We scrutinised the results by means of a questionnaire administered to 102 academic heads of postgraduate studies at 42 Spanish universities. We found that almost all universities have plagiarism detection tools, the majority have academic regulations or specific codes of conduct for postgraduate students that address the issue of fraud or dishonesty. It was also found that specific training programmes on academic and research integrity for PhD students are more frequent than those for master's students, and the least used strategies to deal with dishonest student behaviour are the use of awareness-raising mechanisms and the use of an identity control system for online assessable activities. Moreover, there are some significant differences in the outcomes between public and private universities. Our findings highlight the need for Spanish universities to address the development of a clear academic integrity policy.

Keywords: Academic integrity; Fraud; Higher education; Research integrity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Akbari A. Spinning-translation and the act of plagiarising: how to avoid and resist. J. Furth. High. Educ. 2020;45(1):49–64.
    1. American-Association-of-School-Librarians . American Library Association; 2009. Standards for the 21st-century Learner in Action.
    1. Awasthi S. Plagiarism and academic misconduct A systematic review. DESIDOC J. Libr. Inform. Technol. 2019;39(2):94–100.
    1. Bao Y., Chen G., Hauff C. 10th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, Wuhan, China. 2017, junio 25–28. On the prevalence of multiple-account cheating in massive open online learning: a replication study.https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED596613.pdf [Presentation]
    1. Baran L., Jonason P.K. Academic dishonesty among university students: the roles of the psychopathy, motivation, and self-efficacy. PLoS One. 2020;15(8) - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources