Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 29:13:872464.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.872464. eCollection 2022.

Research on the Public Opinion Guidance Mechanism of Major Public Health Incidents

Affiliations

Research on the Public Opinion Guidance Mechanism of Major Public Health Incidents

Yuqi Wang et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Public opinion guidance plays a crucial role in the management of major public health incidents, and thus, exploring its mechanism is conducive to the comprehensive governance of social security. This study conducts a case study on the anti-pandemic public opinion guidance and analyzes the public opinion representation and the internal mechanism of public opinion guidance in the context of the COVID-19 in China. The findings suggest that the public opinion on the COVID-19 manifested a three-stage progressive and stable tendency and witnessed the strength of China, specifically, benefiting from the systematic and complete integration and release mechanism for anti-pandemic information, the three-dimensional mechanism for the dissemination of knowledge related to pandemic prevention and health, the innovative disclosure mechanism for precise information, and diversified channels for international public opinion guidance. The guidance mechanism proposed in this study provides significant suggestions for the public opinion guidance of global major public health incidents in future.

Keywords: COVID-19 pandemic; guidance mechanism; major public health incidents; network text analysis method; public opinion analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
High-frequency keywords in each stage.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Network semantic relations of keywords of the public opinion in major public health incidents.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Emotional distribution of the public opinion at each stage.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ai C., Chen B., He L., Lai K., Qiu X. (2018). The national geographic characteristics of online public opinion propagation in China based on WeChat network. GeoInformatica 22 311–334.
    1. Asano T. A., Kaneko T., Omori S., Takamiya S., Taniguchi M. (2021). Predictable crises shape public opinion: Evidence from the COVID-19 natural experiment. J. Elect. Pub. Opin. Parties 31 311–320.
    1. Barton L. (1993). Crisis in Organizations: managing and Communicating in the Heat of Chaos. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western Publishing Company.
    1. Bennett B., Carney T. (2017). Public health emergencies of international concern: global, regional, and local responses to risk. Med. Law Rev. 25 223–239. 10.1093/medlaw/fwx004 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bi Q., Wu Y., Mei S., Ye C., Zou X., Zhang Z., et al. (2020). Epidemiology and transmission of COVID-19 in 391 cases and 1286 of their close contacts in Shenzhen, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 20 911–919. 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30287-5 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources