Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec 20;26(3):e434-e439.
doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1730018. eCollection 2022 Jul.

Rhinological Status of Patients with Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction

Vasily D Yartsev  1 , Eugenia L Atkova  1 , Eugeniy O Rozmanov  1 , Nina D Yartseva  2
Affiliations

Rhinological Status of Patients with Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction

Vasily D Yartsev et al. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. .

Abstract

Introduction Studying the state of the nasal cavity and its sinuses and the morphometric parameters of the inferior nasal conchae, as well as a comparative analysis of obtained values in patients with primary (PANDO) and secondary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (SALDO), is relevant. Objective To study the rhinological status of patients with PANDO) and SALDO). Methods The present study was based on the results of computed tomography (CT) dacryocystography in patients with PANDO ( n = 45) and SALDO due to exposure to radioactive iodine ( n = 14). The control group included CT images of paranasal sinuses in patients with no pathology ( n = 49). Rhinological status according to the Newman and Lund-Mackay scales and volume of the inferior nasal conchae were assessed. Statistical processing included nonparametric statistics methods; χ 2 Pearson test; and the Spearman rank correlation method. Results The difference in values of the Newman and Lund-Mackay scales for the tested groups was significant. A significant difference in scores by the Newman scale was revealed when comparing the results of patients with SALDO and PANDO. Comparing the scores by the Lund-Mackay scale, a significant difference was found between the results of patients with SALDO and PANDO and between the results of patients with PANDO and the control group. Conclusion It was demonstrated that the rhinological status of patients with PANDO was worse than that of patients with SALDO and of subjects in the control group. No connection was found between the volume of the inferior nasal conchae and the development of lacrimal duct obstruction.

Keywords: Nasolacrimal Duct; computed tomography; dacryocystography; lund-mackay scale; newman scale; sinus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interests The authors have no conflict of interests to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Distribution of values obtained by evaluating computed tomography results by the Newman scale.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Distribution of values obtained by evaluating computed tomography results by the Lund-Mackay scale.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Computed tomography results in a patient with SALDO (a) and PANDO (b) during inferior nasal concha volume measurement.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ali M J, Paulsen F. Etiopathogenesis of Primary Acquired Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction: What We Know and What We Need to Know. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;35(05):426–433. - PubMed
    1. Clark K, Vendt B, Smith K. The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA): maintaining and operating a public information repository. J Digit Imaging. 2013;26(06):1045–1057. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kwan J YY, Su J, Huang S H. Radiomic Biomarkers to Refine Risk Models for Distant Metastasis in HPV-related Oropharyngeal Carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018;102(04):1107–1116. - PubMed
    1. Lund V J, Mackay I S. Staging in rhinosinusitus. Rhinology. 1993;31(04):183–184. - PubMed
    1. Newman L J, Platts-Mills T A, Phillips C D, Hazen K C, Gross C W. Chronic sinusitis. Relationship of computed tomographic findings to allergy, asthma, and eosinophilia. JAMA. 1994;271(05):363–367. - PubMed