Comparison of Tamsulosin and Tadalafil effects in LUTS treatment considering patients' atherosclerosis risk level
- PMID: 35846856
- PMCID: PMC9283796
- DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104137
Comparison of Tamsulosin and Tadalafil effects in LUTS treatment considering patients' atherosclerosis risk level
Abstract
Introduction: To date, no study evaluates the effect of atherosclerosis risk level on the efficacy of BPH drug therapies. Therefore, the present study aimed to assess the effect of atherosclerosis risk levels on the effectiveness of Tamsulosin and Tadalafil in LUTS treatment.
Methods: The present study was a randomized clinical trial that assessed men with LUTS symptoms (at least six months). The inclusion criteria were being older than 50 years, international prostate symptom score (IPSS) ≥ 13, and maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) between 4 and 15 ml/s. Framingham Risk Score was used to measure atherosclerosis risk. The patients were classified into four groups, including group 1: Patients with low risk and treated with Tamsulosin (0.4 mg/day), group 2: Patients with low risk and treated with Tadalafil (5 mg/day), group 3: Patients with high risk and treated with Tamsulosin (0.4 mg/day), group 4: Patients with high risk and treated with Tadalafil (5 mg/day).
Results: The study included 44 and 38 patients receiving Tamsulosin and Tadalafil, respectively. The means (SD) of the baseline age for the Tamsulosin and Tadalafil groups were equal to 60.6 (6.8) and 58.8 (6.7), respectively (p-value = 0.213). The models revealed no impact of the atherosclerosis risk level on the drugs' effects (p-values = 0.378, 0.975, 0.743 for IPSS, QMAX, and VOID, respectively).
Conclusions: The present study's findings could not show the impact of atherosclerosis risk levels on the efficiency of Tamsolusin and Tadalafil in men with LUTS.
Keywords: Benign prostatic hyperplasia; Lower urinary tract symptoms; Tadalafil; Tamsulosin; Treatment.
© 2022 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of IJS Publishing Group Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
There is no conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
A comparative randomized prospective study to evaluate efficacy and safety of combination of tamsulosin and tadalafil vs. tamsulosin or tadalafil alone in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia.J Sex Med. 2014 Jan;11(1):187-96. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12357. Epub 2013 Oct 25. J Sex Med. 2014. PMID: 24165272 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparative efficacy assessment of tamsulosin vs. tamsulosin plus tadalafil in the treatment of LUTS/BPH. Pilot study.J Sex Med. 2008 Sep;5(9):2170-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.00940.x. Epub 2008 Jul 14. J Sex Med. 2008. PMID: 18638006 Clinical Trial.
-
Tadalafil vs. tamsulosin in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia: a prospective, randomized study.Cent European J Urol. 2019;72(1):44-50. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2019.1570. Epub 2019 Mar 14. Cent European J Urol. 2019. PMID: 31011439 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative Effectiveness of Tadalafil versus Tamsulosin in Treating Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Suggestive of Benign Prostate Hyperplasia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Med Sci Monit. 2020 Apr 24;26:e923179. doi: 10.12659/MSM.923179. Med Sci Monit. 2020. PMID: 32327621 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Tadalafil Alone or in Combination with Tamsulosin for the Management for LUTS/BPH and ED.Curr Urol Rep. 2020 Oct 27;21(12):56. doi: 10.1007/s11934-020-01009-7. Curr Urol Rep. 2020. PMID: 33108544 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Chughtai B., Forde J.C., Thomas D.D.M., Laor L., Hossack T., Woo H.H., et al. Benign prostatic hyperplasia. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2016;2(1):1–15. - PubMed
-
- Irwin D.E., Kopp Z.S., Agatep B., Milsom I., Abrams P. Worldwide prevalence estimates of lower urinary tract symptoms, overactive bladder, urinary incontinence and bladder outlet obstruction. BJU Int. 2011;108(7):1132–1138. - PubMed
-
- Thorpe A., Neal D. Benign prostatic hyperplasia. Lancet. 2003;361(9366):1359–1367. - PubMed
-
- Djavan B., Nickel J., De La Rosette J., Abrams P. The urologist view of BPH progression: results of an international survey. Eur. Urol. 2002;41(5):490–496. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources