Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 30:9:885973.
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.885973. eCollection 2022.

Welfare Through Competence: A Framework for Animal-Centric Technology Design

Affiliations

Welfare Through Competence: A Framework for Animal-Centric Technology Design

Sarah Webber et al. Front Vet Sci. .

Abstract

Digital technologies offer new ways to ensure that animals can lead a good life in managed settings. As interactive enrichment and smart environments appear in zoos, farms, shelters, kennels and vet facilities, it is essential that the design of such technologies be guided by clear, scientifically-grounded understandings of what animals need and want, to be successful in improving their wellbeing. The field of Animal-Computer Interaction proposes that this can be achieved by centering animals as stakeholders in technology design, but there remains a need for robust methods to support interdisciplinary teams in placing animals' interests at the heart of design projects. Responding to this gap, we present the Welfare through Competence framework, which is grounded in contemporary animal welfare science, established technology design practices and applied expertise in animal-centered design. The framework brings together the "Five Domains of Animal Welfare" model and the "Coe Individual Competence" model, and provides a structured approach to defining animal-centric objectives and refining them through the course of a design project. In this paper, we demonstrate how design teams can use this framework to promote positive animal welfare in a range of managed settings. These much-needed methodological advances contribute a new theoretical foundation to debates around the possibility of animal-centered design, and offer a practical agenda for creating technologies that support a good life for animals.

Keywords: animal technology; animal welfare; animal-centric design; animal-computer interaction; animals; digital enrichment; interaction design.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
An iterative interaction design process.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The welfare through competence animal objectives canvas.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The welfare through competence interaction design process.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mancini C. Animal-computer interaction: a manifesto. Interactions. (2011) 18:69–73. 10.1145/1978822.1978836 - DOI
    1. North S, Mancini C. Frameworks for ACI: animals as stakeholders in the design process. Interactions. (2016) 23:34–6. 10.1145/2946043 - DOI
    1. French F, Mancini C, Sharp H. Exploring research through design in animal computer interaction. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction, ACI2017. New York, NY: ACM; (2017). 10.1145/3152130.3152147 - DOI
    1. Broom DM. The scientific assessment of animal welfare. Appl Anim Behav Sci. (1988) 20:5–19. 10.1016/0168-1591(88)90122-0 - DOI
    1. Broom DM. Animal welfare defined in terms of attempts to cope with the environment. Acta Agric Scand Sec Anim Sci Suppl. (1996) 27:22–8.