Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 1:12:925100.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.925100. eCollection 2022.

Comparison of Diagnostic Efficacy of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and [18F]FDG PET/CT for Staging and Restaging of Gastric Cancer

Affiliations

Comparison of Diagnostic Efficacy of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and [18F]FDG PET/CT for Staging and Restaging of Gastric Cancer

Shumao Zhang et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the potential diagnostic efficacy of gallium68-fibroblast-activation protein inhibitor ([68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04) and fluorine18-fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]-FDG) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) for primary tumors, lymph nodes, and distant metastatic lesions of gastric cancer (GC), and to explore the effects of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and [18F]-FDG on tumor staging and restaging in GC.

Methods: This single-center retrospective study (NCT2100044131) was conducted at the Affiliated Hospital of the Southwest Medical University between June 2020 and December 2021. Images of patients with GC who were pathologically confirmed and underwent contemporaneous [18F]-FDG and [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT within 1 week were analyzed. The diagnostic efficacy of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT and [18F]-FDG PET/CT for TNM staging of GC was compared using McNemar test. The maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) of each lesion in the two imaging types was compared using the Mann-Whitney U test.

Results: In total, 25 patients with GC (mean age, 56 ± 12 years) were evaluated. [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT exhibited higher sensitivity compared to [18F]-FDG PET/CT for detecting primary tumors (18/19 [94.74%] vs. 13/19 [68.42%], χ2 = 6.866, P < 0.01), lymph node metastasis (75/77 [97.40%] vs. 32/77 [41.56%], χ2 = 2.888, P =0.089), and distant metastases (275/283 [97.17%] vs. 122/283 [43.11%], χ2 = 11.858, P < 0.01). [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 accumulation was significantly higher than that of [18F]FDG in tumors (median SUVmax, 10.28 vs 3.20; U=59.00, P < 0.01), lymph node metastasis metastases (median SUVmax, 9.20 vs 3.15; U=53.50, P < 0.01), and distant metastases (median SUVmax, 8.00 vs 4.20; U=200.00, P < 0.01). Compared to [18F]-FDG PET/CT, [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT resulted in new oncological findings in 14/25 patients and corrected tumor staging or restaging in 7/25 patients.

Conclusion: Our preliminary results regarding the impact of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT on tumor staging highlight the potential of this approach for increasing the accuracy of GC diagnosis, which may facilitate treatment decision-making.

Keywords: PET/CT; [18F]-FDG; [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04; gastric cancer; tumor staging.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A 64-year-old woman with poorly differentiated gastric adenocarcinoma based on pathological biopsy under gastroscopy. Both [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 (A, C) and [18F]-FDG PET/CT (F, H) were negative in the primary focus. Compared with [18F]-FDG PET/CT (E–G), [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT (B–D) resulted in a higher liver/background ratio and identified more liver lesions (slender arrows, SUVmax=6.3 vs. 11.3) and para-aortic lymph node metastases (dashed arrows, SUVmax=12.8 vs. 8.0).
Figure 2
Figure 2
A 47-year-old female patient with poorly differentiated gastric adenocarcinoma with partial signet ring cells based on pathological biopsy after operation. [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT (A–D) revealed high uptake in the gastric cardia (slender arrows, SUVmax=13.3), para-aortic lymph nodes (dashed arrows, SUVmax=15.7), and supraclavicular lymph nodes (short arrows, SUVmax=8.0) but negative uptake was observed on FDG PET/CT (E–H). [18F]-FDG PET/CT (F) revealed increased uptake in the gastric anastomosis (bent arrow, SUVmax=3.2) but negative uptake was observed on [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT (C). The lesion was ultimately confirmed as residual gastritis by gastroscopic biopsy.
Figure 3
Figure 3
A 35-year-old female patient with moderately differentiated gastric adenocarcinoma based on pathological biopsy under gastroscopy. [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04PET/CT (A–D) revealed high uptake in the primary tumor (arrows, SUVmax=8.3) but negative uptake was observed on [18F]-FDG PET/CT (E–H).
Figure 4
Figure 4
A 40-year-old female patient with poorly differentiated gastric adenocarcinoma based on pathological biopsy under gastroscopy. [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT (A–C) revealed high uptake in the primary tumor (slender arrows, SUVmax=10.3) and lesser curved lymph nodes in the stomach (triangles, SUVmax=3.2), but negative uptake was observed on [18F]-FDG PET/CT (E, F, H). [18F]-FDG PET/CT (H) revealed brown fat visualization at the base of the neck and in the supraclavicular fossa. [18F]-FDG PET/CT (G) revealed high uptake in the right ovarian (dashed arrows, SUVmax=8.2), but negative uptake was observed on [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT (D).
Figure 5
Figure 5
A 56-year-old male patient with poorly differentiated gastric adenocarcinoma based on pathological biopsy under gastroscopy. [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT (A–D) revealed high uptake in the primary tumor (slender arrows, SUVmax=14.6) and lesser curved lymph nodes of the stomach (dashed arrows, SUVmax=8.7), but moderate uptake in the primary tumor (bent arrows, SUVmax=5.3) and negative uptake of lesser curved lymph nodes of the stomach were observed on [18F]-FDG PET/CT (E–H).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Smyth EC, Nilsson M, Grabsch HI, van Grieken NCT, Lordick F. Gastric Cancer. Lancet (2020) 396(10251):635–48. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)31288-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Horton KM, Fishman EK. Current Role of Ct in Imaging of the Stomach. Radiographics A Rev Publ Radiol Soc North America Inc (2003) 23(1):75–87. doi: 10.1148/rg.231025071 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Young JJ, Pahwa A, Patel M, Jude CM, Nguyen M, Deshmukh M, et al. . Ligaments and Lymphatic Pathways in Gastric Adenocarcinoma. Radiographics (2019) 39(3):668–89. doi: 10.1148/rg.2019180113 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Peng D, He J, Liu H, Cao J, Wang Y, Chen Y. Fapi Pet/Ct Research Progress in Digestive System Tumors. Dig Liver Dis (2022) 54(2):164–9. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2021.07.011 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Guo W, Chen H. (68)Ga Fapi Pet/Ct Imaging in Peritoneal Carcinomatosis. Radiology (2020) 297(3):521. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020202469 - DOI - PubMed