Comparison of Diagnostic Efficacy of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and [18F]FDG PET/CT for Staging and Restaging of Gastric Cancer
- PMID: 35847877
- PMCID: PMC9283765
- DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.925100
Comparison of Diagnostic Efficacy of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and [18F]FDG PET/CT for Staging and Restaging of Gastric Cancer
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to compare the potential diagnostic efficacy of gallium68-fibroblast-activation protein inhibitor ([68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04) and fluorine18-fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]-FDG) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) for primary tumors, lymph nodes, and distant metastatic lesions of gastric cancer (GC), and to explore the effects of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and [18F]-FDG on tumor staging and restaging in GC.
Methods: This single-center retrospective study (NCT2100044131) was conducted at the Affiliated Hospital of the Southwest Medical University between June 2020 and December 2021. Images of patients with GC who were pathologically confirmed and underwent contemporaneous [18F]-FDG and [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT within 1 week were analyzed. The diagnostic efficacy of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT and [18F]-FDG PET/CT for TNM staging of GC was compared using McNemar test. The maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) of each lesion in the two imaging types was compared using the Mann-Whitney U test.
Results: In total, 25 patients with GC (mean age, 56 ± 12 years) were evaluated. [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT exhibited higher sensitivity compared to [18F]-FDG PET/CT for detecting primary tumors (18/19 [94.74%] vs. 13/19 [68.42%], χ2 = 6.866, P < 0.01), lymph node metastasis (75/77 [97.40%] vs. 32/77 [41.56%], χ2 = 2.888, P =0.089), and distant metastases (275/283 [97.17%] vs. 122/283 [43.11%], χ2 = 11.858, P < 0.01). [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 accumulation was significantly higher than that of [18F]FDG in tumors (median SUVmax, 10.28 vs 3.20; U=59.00, P < 0.01), lymph node metastasis metastases (median SUVmax, 9.20 vs 3.15; U=53.50, P < 0.01), and distant metastases (median SUVmax, 8.00 vs 4.20; U=200.00, P < 0.01). Compared to [18F]-FDG PET/CT, [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT resulted in new oncological findings in 14/25 patients and corrected tumor staging or restaging in 7/25 patients.
Conclusion: Our preliminary results regarding the impact of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT on tumor staging highlight the potential of this approach for increasing the accuracy of GC diagnosis, which may facilitate treatment decision-making.
Keywords: PET/CT; [18F]-FDG; [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04; gastric cancer; tumor staging.
Copyright © 2022 Zhang, Wang, Xu, Ding, Li, Liu, Huang, Liu, Du, Zhao, Chen and Qiu.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Evaluation of FAPI PET imaging in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Theranostics. 2023 Aug 21;13(13):4694-4710. doi: 10.7150/thno.88335. eCollection 2023. Theranostics. 2023. PMID: 37649615 Free PMC article.
-
Prospective Comparison of 68Ga-FAPI versus 18F-FDG PET/CT for Tumor Staging in Biliary Tract Cancers.Radiology. 2022 Sep;304(3):648-657. doi: 10.1148/radiol.213118. Epub 2022 May 17. Radiology. 2022. PMID: 35579524
-
Superiority of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04/[18F]FAPI-42 PET/CT to [18F]FDG PET/CT in delineating the primary tumor and peritoneal metastasis in initial gastric cancer.Eur Radiol. 2022 Sep;32(9):6281-6290. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08743-1. Epub 2022 Apr 5. Eur Radiol. 2022. Retraction in: Eur Radiol. 2023 Jun;33(6):4511. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-09386-y. PMID: 35380229 Retracted.
-
[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT in the evaluation of gastric cancer: comparison with [18F]FDG PET/CT.Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022 Jul;49(8):2960-2971. doi: 10.1007/s00259-022-05799-5. Epub 2022 Apr 25. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022. PMID: 35462566
-
Head to head comparison of 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT with 18F-FDG PET/CT in primary and metastatic lesions of gastric tumor: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Hell J Nucl Med. 2024 Jan-Apr;27(1):35-45. doi: 10.1967/s002449912703. Epub 2024 Apr 18. Hell J Nucl Med. 2024. PMID: 38629816
Cited by
-
Comparison of 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT with CECT in the evaluation of peritoneal metastases from gastrointestinal cancers and impact on clinical decision-making.J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2025 Jul 4;151(7):201. doi: 10.1007/s00432-025-06237-3. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2025. PMID: 40610672 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of FAPI PET imaging in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Theranostics. 2023 Aug 21;13(13):4694-4710. doi: 10.7150/thno.88335. eCollection 2023. Theranostics. 2023. PMID: 37649615 Free PMC article.
-
Head-to-head comparison of 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of primary digestive system cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Front Oncol. 2023 Jun 26;13:1202505. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1202505. eCollection 2023. Front Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37434980 Free PMC article.
-
Application of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging in recurrent anastomotic tumors after surgery in digestive tract tumors.World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Aug 27;16(8):2474-2483. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i8.2474. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024. PMID: 39220071 Free PMC article.
-
Imaging in Gastric Cancer: Current Practice and Future Perspectives.Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Mar 28;13(7):1276. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13071276. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37046494 Free PMC article. Review.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous