Outcomes of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute K12 program in emergency care research: 7-year follow-up
- PMID: 35848052
- PMCID: PMC10399684
- DOI: 10.1111/acem.14563
Outcomes of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute K12 program in emergency care research: 7-year follow-up
Abstract
Background: Long-term follow-up for clinician-scientist training programs is sparse. We describe the outcomes of clinician-scientist scholars in the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) K12 program in emergency care research up to 8.7 years after matriculation in the program.
Methods: This was a cohort study of faculty clinician-scientist scholars enrolled in a NHLBI K12 research training program at 6 sites across the US, with median follow-up 7.7 years (range 5.7-8.7 years) from the date of matriculation. Scholars completed electronic surveys in 2017 and 2019, with the 2019 survey collecting information for their current work setting, percent time for research, and grant funding from all sources. We used NIH RePorter and online resources to verify federal grants through March 2021. The primary outcome was a funded career development award (CDA) or research project grant (RPG) where the scholar was principal investigator. We included funding from all federal sources and national foundations.
Results: There were 43 scholars, including 16 (37%) women. Over the follow-up period, 32 (74%) received an individual CDA or RPG, with a median of 36 months (range 9-83 months) after entering the program. Of the 43 scholars, 23 (54%) received a CDA and 22 (51%) received an RPG, 7 (16%) of which were R01s. Of the 23 scholars who received a CDA, 13 (56%) subsequently had an RPG funded. Time to CDA or RPG did not differ by sex (women vs. men log-rank test p = 0.27) or specialty training (emergency medicine versus other specialties, p = 0.59).
Conclusions: After 7 years of follow-up for this NHLBI K12 emergency care research training program, three quarters of clinician-scientist scholars had obtained CDA or RPG funding, with no notable differences by sex or clinical training.
© 2022 Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.
Conflict of interest statement
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
No author had conflicts of interest related to this study.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Scholarly activity following National Institutes of Health Women's Reproductive Health Research K12 training-a cohort study.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Oct;229(4):425.e1-425.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.06.050. Epub 2023 Jul 16. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023. PMID: 37437707 Free PMC article.
-
The First National Institutes of Health Institutional Training Program in Emergency Care Research: Productivity and Outcomes.Ann Emerg Med. 2018 Dec;72(6):679-690. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.06.018. Epub 2018 Aug 2. Ann Emerg Med. 2018. PMID: 30078658 Free PMC article.
-
The Pediatric Critical Care Trauma Scientist Development: Building a Community of Scientists for the Fields of Pediatric Critical Care and Trauma Surgery.Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2020 Jul;21(7):672-678. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002348. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2020. PMID: 32453922 Free PMC article.
-
The State of National Institute of Health Awards for funding genetic counseling research, resources, and training over the past decade.J Genet Couns. 2024 Dec;33(6):1159-1175. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1850. Epub 2024 Jan 24. J Genet Couns. 2024. PMID: 38264803 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Training Physician‒Scientists for Careers in Investigative Dermatology.JID Innov. 2021 Oct 19;2(1):100061. doi: 10.1016/j.xjidi.2021.100061. eCollection 2022 Jan. JID Innov. 2021. PMID: 35146478 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Pediatric Disaster Science: Understanding Needs, Highlighting Imperatives, and Leveraging Opportunities.NAM Perspect. 2024 Sep 23;2024:10.31478/202409a. doi: 10.31478/202409a. eCollection 2024. NAM Perspect. 2024. PMID: 39896747 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
References
-
- Physician-Scientist Workforce (PSW) Report 2014. 2014.
-
- Jain MK, Cheung VG, Utz PJ, Kobilka BK, Yamada T, Lefkowitz R. Saving the endangered physician-scientist - a plan for accelerating medical breakthroughs. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(5):399–402. - PubMed