Re: The Carbon Footprint of Single-Use Flexible Cystoscopes Compared with Reusable Cystoscopes: Methodological Flaws Led to the Erroneous Conclusion That Single-Use Is "Better"
- PMID: 35848502
- DOI: 10.1089/end.2022.0482
Re: The Carbon Footprint of Single-Use Flexible Cystoscopes Compared with Reusable Cystoscopes: Methodological Flaws Led to the Erroneous Conclusion That Single-Use Is "Better"
Comment on
-
The Carbon Footprint of Single-Use Flexible Cystoscopes Compared with Reusable Cystoscopes.J Endourol. 2022 Nov;36(11):1460-1464. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0891. Epub 2022 Jun 13. J Endourol. 2022. PMID: 35607858
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
