Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Apr;133(4):732-741.
doi: 10.1002/lary.30291. Epub 2022 Jul 18.

Machine Learning in Diagnosing Middle Ear Disorders Using Tympanic Membrane Images: A Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Review

Machine Learning in Diagnosing Middle Ear Disorders Using Tympanic Membrane Images: A Meta-Analysis

Zuwei Cao et al. Laryngoscope. 2023 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: To systematically evaluate the development of Machine Learning (ML) models and compare their diagnostic accuracy for the classification of Middle Ear Disorders (MED) using Tympanic Membrane (TM) images.

Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and CENTRAL were searched up until November 30, 2021. Studies on the development of ML approaches for diagnosing MED using TM images were selected according to the inclusion criteria. PRISMA guidelines were followed with study design, analysis method, and outcomes extracted. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were used to summarize the performance metrics of the meta-analysis. Risk of Bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool in combination with the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool.

Results: Sixteen studies were included, encompassing 20254 TM images (7025 normal TM and 13229 MED). The sample size ranged from 45 to 6066 per study. The accuracy of the 25 included ML approaches ranged from 76.00% to 98.26%. Eleven studies (68.8%) were rated as having a low risk of bias, with the reference standard as the major domain of high risk of bias (37.5%). Sensitivity and specificity were 93% (95% CI, 90%-95%) and 85% (95% CI, 82%-88%), respectively. The AUC of total TM images was 94% (95% CI, 91%-96%). The greater AUC was found using otoendoscopic images than otoscopic images.

Conclusions: ML approaches perform robustly in distinguishing between normal ears and MED, however, it is proposed that a standardized TM image acquisition and annotation protocol should be developed.

Level of evidence: NA Laryngoscope, 133:732-741, 2023.

Keywords: artificial intelligence; deep learning; hearing healthcare; machine learning; middle ear disorders; otitis media; otoscopy; tympanic membrane.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

    1. Lee JY, Choi S-H, Chung JW. Automated classification of the tympanic membrane using a convolutional neural network. Appl Sci. 2019;9:1827.
    1. Graydon K, Waterworth C, Miller H, Gunasekera H. Global burden of hearing impairment and ear disease. J Laryngol Otol. 2019;133:18-25.
    1. Cai Y, Yu JG, Chen Y, et al. Investigating the use of a two-stage attention-aware convolutional neural network for the automated diagnosis of otitis media from tympanic membrane images: a prediction model development and validation study. BMJ Open. 2021;11:e041139.
    1. World Health Organization. Childhood Hearing Loss: Strategies for Prevention and Care. 2016.
    1. Schilder AG, Chonmaitree T, Cripps AW, et al. Otitis media. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:1-18.

LinkOut - more resources