Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb;47(2):447-456.
doi: 10.1007/s00264-022-05508-9. Epub 2022 Jul 18.

Robotics in spine surgery: systematic review of literature

Affiliations

Robotics in spine surgery: systematic review of literature

Ignacio Barrio Lopez et al. Int Orthop. 2023 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: Over 4.83 million spine surgery procedures are performed annually around the world. With the considerable caseload and the precision needed to achieve optimal spinal instrumentation, technical progress has helped to improve the technique's safety and accuracy with the development of peri-operative assistance tools. Contrary to other surgical applications already part of the standard of care, the development of robotics in spine surgery is still a novelty and is not widely available nor used. Robotics, especially when coupled with other guidance modalities such as navigation, seems to be a promising tool in our quest for accuracy, improving patient outcomes and reducing surgical complications. Robotics in spine surgery may also be for the surgeon a way to progress in terms of ergonomics, but also to respond to a growing concern among surgical teams to reduce radiation exposure.

Method: We present in this recent systematic review of the literature realized according to the PRISMA guidelines the place of robotics in spine surgery, reviewing the comparison to standard techniques, the current and future indications, the learning curve, the impact on radiation exposure, and the cost-effectiveness.

Results: Seventy-six relevant original studies were identified and analyzed for the review.

Conclusion: Robotics has proved to be a safe help for spine surgery, both for the patient with a decrease of operating time and increase in pedicular screw accuracy, and for the surgical team with a decrease of radiation exposure. Medico-economic studies demonstrated that despite a high buying cost, the purchase of a robot dedicated for spine surgery is cost-effective resulting in lesser revision, lower infection, reduced length of stay, and shorter surgical procedure.

Keywords: Pedicle screw; Robotics; Spine; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. OpenPR Global surgical robots for the spine industry trend, growth, shares, strategy and forecasts 2016 to 2022
    1. Grob D, Magerl F, McGowan DP (1990) Spinal pedicle fixation: reliability and validity of roentgenogram-based assessment and surgical factors on successful screw placement. Spine 15:251 - DOI
    1. Boucher HH (1959) A method of spinal fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 41:248–259. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.41B2.248 - DOI
    1. Roy-Camille R, Saillant G, Berteaux D, Salgado V (1976) Osteosynthesis of thoraco-lumbar spine fractures with metal plates screwed through the vertebral pedicles. Reconstr Surg Traumatol 15:2–16
    1. Sun J, Wu D, Wang Q et al (2020) Pedicle screw insertion: is O-arm-based navigation superior to the conventional freehand technique? A systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg 144:e87–e99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.07.205 - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources