Non-motor features of essential tremor with midline distribution
- PMID: 35849198
- DOI: 10.1007/s10072-022-06262-x
Non-motor features of essential tremor with midline distribution
Abstract
Background: Midline essential tremor (Mid-ET) is a distinctive group of essential tremor (ET) in which tremor affects the neck, jaw, tongue, and/or voice. For long, it has been considered as an ultimate stage of the disease and a marker of its severity. However, recent studies pointed its complexity in terms of non-motor presentation. Thus, we aimed to investigate the non-motor signs (NMS) in Mid-ET.
Design: We conducted a cross-sectional study in a tertiary neurology referral center including ET patients classified into two groups based on the presence or not of midline tremor (Mid-ET vs. No-Mid-ET). We assessed NMS using the non-motor severity scale (NMSS), a large battery of cognitive tests, clinical and electrophysiological study of the autonomic nervous system along with the evaluation of sleep disturbances.
Results: A total of 163 patients were included: Mid-ET (n = 79) and No-Mid-ET (n = 84) matched in gender and age of onset. Mid-ET patients had higher proportion of late-onset ET (> 60 years old, p = 0.002) and more extrapyramidal signs (p = 0.005). For NMS, Mid-ET was marked with cognitive dysfunction (p = 0.008). The hallmarks of the neuropsychiatric profile of Mid-ET were executive dysfunction (p = 0.004), attention problems (p < 0.000), episodic memory impairment (p = 0.003), and greater depression (p = 0.010). The presence of RBD was a trait of Mid-ET (p = 0.039). In both Mid-ET and No-Mid-ET phenotypes, clinical and neurophysiological dysautonomia correlated with cognitive dysfunction.
Conclusion: Mid-ET patients had greater cognitive dysfunction, depression, RBD, higher proportion of late-onset ET, and more extrapyramidal signs. Taken all together, these findings could provide a redesigned insight into the underlying physiopathology of Mid-ET indicative of a greater cerebellar dysfunction.
Keywords: Cognition; Essential tremor; Head tremor; Midline tremor; Non-motor signs.
© 2022. Fondazione Società Italiana di Neurologia.
References
-
- Bologna M, Berardelli I, Paparella G, Ferrazzano G, Angelini L, Giustini P et al (2019) Tremor distribution and the variable clinical presentation of essential tremor. Cerebellum Lond Engl 18(5):866–872. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-019-01070-0 - DOI
-
- Chen W, Hopfner F, Szymczak S, Granert O, Müller SH, Kuhlenbäumer G et al (2017) Topography of essential tremor. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 40:58–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2017.04.012 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Chandran V, Pal PK (2013) Quality of life and its determinants in essential tremor. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 19(1):62–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2012.06.011 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Parkinson J (2002) An essay on the shaking palsy 1817. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 214(2):223–36. https://doi.org/10.1176/jnp.14.2.223 - DOI
-
- Singer C, Sanchez-Ramos J, Weiner WJ (1994) Gait abnormality in essential tremor. Mov Disord Off J Mov Disord Soc 9(2):193–196. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.870090212 - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
