Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Sep 1;32(5):554-560.
doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000001016. Epub 2022 Jul 15.

Comparative performance of the different orthotopic urinary diversions

Affiliations
Review

Comparative performance of the different orthotopic urinary diversions

Farshad Sheybaee Moghaddam et al. Curr Opin Urol. .

Abstract

Purpose of review: Majority of patients undergoing radical cystectomy are suitable for orthotopic urinary diversion. The effect of different techniques of neobladder reconstruction on early and long-term postoperative complications is still being determined. Additionally, it is unclear which type of neobladder provides the best patient satisfaction. The purpose of this article is to review the outcomes of different orthotopic urinary diversions following radical cystectomy.

Recent findings: Ileal neobladder is the preferred type of orthotopic urinary diversion following radical cystectomy. Hautmann and Studer, which are the most common orthotopic diversion techniques, provide daytime continence rate up to 87% and 92%, respectively. However, nighttime continence is achieved in about 50% of patients. High-level evidence supports the long-term safety of orthotopic neobladder in terms of renal function, even in patients with a glomerular filtration rate <60 ml/min. Sexual dysfunction is the only independent factor associated with poorer quality of life in these patients.

Summary: The best type of neobladder is still uncertain. However, Studer and Hautmann are the most commonly performed techniques that provide favorable short- and long-term outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lee RK, Abol-Enein H, Artibani W, et al. Urinary diversion after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: options, patient selection, and outcomes 2014; 113:11–23.
    1. Lin-Brande M, Nazemi A, Pearce SM, et al. , editors. Assessing trends in urinary diversion after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in the United States. Urologic oncology: seminars and original investigations. Elsevier; 2019.
    1. Hautmann RE, Abol-Enein H, Lee CT, et al. Urinary diversion: how experts divert. Urology 2015; 85:233–238.
    1. Mitra AP, Cai J, Miranda G, et al. Management trends and outcomes of patients undergoing radical cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: evolution of the University of Southern California experience over 3,347 cases. J Urol 2022; 207:302–313.
    1. Daneshmand S. Orthotopic urinary diversion. Curr Opin Urol 2015; 25:545–549.

MeSH terms