Evolution and molecular bases of reproductive isolation
- PMID: 35849861
- PMCID: PMC10210581
- DOI: 10.1016/j.gde.2022.101952
Evolution and molecular bases of reproductive isolation
Abstract
The most challenging problem in speciation research is disentangling the relative strength and order in which different reproductive barriers evolve. Here, we review recent developments in the study of reproductive isolation in yeasts. With over a thousand genome-sequenced isolates readily available for testing the viability, sterility, and fitness of both intraspecies and interspecies hybrid crosses, Saccharomyces yeasts are an ideal model to study such fundamental questions. Our survey demonstrates that, while chromosomal-level mutations are widespread at the intraspecific level, anti-recombination-driven chromosome missegregation is the primary reproductive barrier between species. Finally, despite their strength, all of these postzygotic barriers can be resolved through the asexual life history of hybrids.
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest statement
Nothing declared.
Figures


Similar articles
-
The Rate of Evolution of Postmating-Prezygotic Reproductive Isolation in Drosophila.Mol Biol Evol. 2018 Feb 1;35(2):312-334. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx271. Mol Biol Evol. 2018. PMID: 29048573 Free PMC article.
-
Multiple pre- and postzygotic components of reproductive isolation between two co-occurring Lysimachia species.New Phytol. 2023 Apr;238(2):874-887. doi: 10.1111/nph.18767. Epub 2023 Feb 17. New Phytol. 2023. PMID: 36683441
-
Geographic contrasts between pre- and postzygotic barriers are consistent with reinforcement in Heliconius butterflies.Evolution. 2019 Sep;73(9):1821-1838. doi: 10.1111/evo.13804. Evolution. 2019. PMID: 31334832 Free PMC article.
-
[Genetics of postzygotic reproductive isolation in plants].Genetika. 2009 Jun;45(6):729-44. Genetika. 2009. PMID: 19639864 Review. Russian.
-
Mechanisms of Intrinsic Postzygotic Isolation: From Traditional Genic and Chromosomal Views to Genomic and Epigenetic Perspectives.Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2023 Oct 3;15(10):a041607. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a041607. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2023. PMID: 37696577 Review.
Cited by
-
Meiotic Recognition of Evolutionarily Diverged Homologs: Chromosomal Hybrid Sterility Revisited.Mol Biol Evol. 2023 Apr 4;40(4):msad083. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msad083. Mol Biol Evol. 2023. PMID: 37030001 Free PMC article.
-
Incompatibility and Interchangeability in Molecular Evolution.Genome Biol Evol. 2023 Jan 4;15(1):evac184. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evac184. Genome Biol Evol. 2023. PMID: 36583227 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Artificial chromosome reorganization reveals high plasticity of the budding and fission yeast genomes.Genome Biol. 2025 Jul 29;26(1):229. doi: 10.1186/s13059-025-03689-1. Genome Biol. 2025. PMID: 40731013 Free PMC article.
-
OlCHR, encoding a chromatin remodeling factor, is a killer causing hybrid sterility between rice species Oryza sativa and O. longistaminata.iScience. 2024 Apr 17;27(5):109761. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109761. eCollection 2024 May 17. iScience. 2024. PMID: 38706863 Free PMC article.
-
Chromosome number variation and phylogenetic divergence of East Asian Cirsium sect. Onotrophe subsect. Nipponocirsium (Compositae), with a new species from Taiwan.Bot Stud. 2025 Feb 14;66(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s40529-025-00454-2. Bot Stud. 2025. PMID: 39953173 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ono J, Greig D, Boynton PJ: Defining and disrupting species boundaries in Saccharomyces. Ann Rev Microbiol 2020, 74:477–495. - PubMed
-
- Bendixsen DP, Frazão JG, Stelkens R: Saccharomyces yeast hybrids on the rise. Yeast 2022, 39:40–54. - PubMed
-
- Rogers DW, Denton JA, McConnell E, Greig D: Experimental evolution of species recognition. Curr Biol 2015, 25:1753–1758. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources