Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Oct:76:101952.
doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2022.101952. Epub 2022 Jul 16.

Evolution and molecular bases of reproductive isolation

Affiliations
Review

Evolution and molecular bases of reproductive isolation

G Ozan Bozdag et al. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2022 Oct.

Abstract

The most challenging problem in speciation research is disentangling the relative strength and order in which different reproductive barriers evolve. Here, we review recent developments in the study of reproductive isolation in yeasts. With over a thousand genome-sequenced isolates readily available for testing the viability, sterility, and fitness of both intraspecies and interspecies hybrid crosses, Saccharomyces yeasts are an ideal model to study such fundamental questions. Our survey demonstrates that, while chromosomal-level mutations are widespread at the intraspecific level, anti-recombination-driven chromosome missegregation is the primary reproductive barrier between species. Finally, despite their strength, all of these postzygotic barriers can be resolved through the asexual life history of hybrids.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement

Nothing declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mechanisms of reproductive isolation in yeast. The main reproductive barriers in yeast can be broadly broken down into three categories: those that affect whole chromosomes, those that are caused by genetic incompatibility at a few loci, and prezygotic isolation. Anti‐recombination inhibits correct segregation of chromosomes during meiosis, resulting in spores that carry either two copies or zero copies (inviable) of the chromosome. Both polyploidy and aneuploidy can result in difficulties segregating chromosomes evenly during meiosis. Chromosomal rearrangements, such as the reciprocal translocations represented here, lead to unbalanced gametes missing genes in translocated regions. Genetic incompatibilities can act either between nuclear genes and mitochondrial genes or between sets of nuclear genes. Finally, prezygotic isolation in the form of ecological isolation can occur when different genotypes are able to thrive under different environmental conditions.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Genetic distance results in an exponential decay in hybrid gamete viability. Genome-wide sequence divergence results in a correlated exponential decline (blue line; R2=0.9307; df=66) in viability of hybrids with collinear genomes (blue symbols). This negative impact is noticeable even at divergence levels < 2%, highlighting the role of anti‐recombination in the early phases of the yeast speciation process. On the other hand, large-scale chromosomal differences constitute a powerful part of RI across many incipient species crosses but not between established species (gray symbols — excluded from the correlation analysis). Data for this figure are extracted from [–15,35,76] and are available in Supplementary Data 1.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Boekhout T, Aime MC, Begerow D, Gabaldón T, Heitman J, Kemler M, Khayhan K, Lachance M-A, Louis EJ, Sun S: The evolving species concepts used for yeasts: from phenotypes and genomes to speciation networks. Fungal Divers 2021, 109:27–55. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ono J, Greig D, Boynton PJ: Defining and disrupting species boundaries in Saccharomyces. Ann Rev Microbiol 2020, 74:477–495. - PubMed
    1. Bendixsen DP, Frazão JG, Stelkens R: Saccharomyces yeast hybrids on the rise. Yeast 2022, 39:40–54. - PubMed
    1. Rogers DW, Denton JA, McConnell E, Greig D: Experimental evolution of species recognition. Curr Biol 2015, 25:1753–1758. - PubMed
    1. Marinoni G, Manuel M, Petersen RF, Hvidtfeldt J, Sulo P, Piskur J: Horizontal transfer of genetic material among Saccharomyces yeasts. J Bacteriol 1999, 181:6488–6496. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types