What is the believability of evidence that is read or heard by physical therapists?
- PMID: 35849892
- PMCID: PMC9294255
- DOI: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2022.100428
What is the believability of evidence that is read or heard by physical therapists?
Abstract
Background: Physical therapists obtain information from a variety of sources. The sources may influence their believability and use in clinical practice.
Objectives: In this hypothesis-based study, we queried physical therapists (PTs) on the believability of evidence across six musculoskeletal treatment domains and analyzed variables that predicted the strength of beliefs.
Methods: This international survey included six different language portals and used a snowball dispensation strategy. PTs who were credentialed, licensed, or who practiced in the field, were queried on the believability of six treatment domains (i.e., exercise, manual therapy, psychologically-informed practice, sports/occupational performance, thermal/electrical agents, and pain science/patient education) and potential predictors of believability (i.e., social media use, years of practice, time and access to literature, specialization, confidence in reviewing literature and attributions of the researcher).
Results: In total, 1098 PTs from 36 countries completed the survey. PTs had strong beliefs in what they read or hear about exercise, sports/occupational performance, pain science/patient education, and psychologically-informed interventions. There was only moderate believability regarding manual therapy treatment and weak believability associated with thermal/electrical agents. Multiple linear regression analyses revealed that the most robust predictor to outcome relationships included time and access to literature and believability of pain science/patient education, years of clinical practice and believability of psychologically informed practice, and believability of thermal/electrical agents.
Conclusion: An important takeaway from this study is that believability was influenced by several factors (primarily by years of practice, attributions of the researcher, and time and access to literature) and appeared to vary across treatment domains.
Keywords: Credibility; Musculoskeletal; Physical therapy; Social media.
Copyright © 2022 Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Figures
References
-
- Fell D.W., Burnham J.F., Dockery J.M. Determining where physical therapists get information to support clinical practice decisions. Health Info Libr J. 2013;30(1):35–48. - PubMed
-
- Chandra A., Khullar D., Lee T.H. Addressing the challenge of gray-zone medicine. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(3):203–205. - PubMed
-
- Cook C.E., O'Connell N.E., Hall T., George S.Z., Jull G., Wright A.A., et al. Benefits and threats to using social media for presenting and implementing evidence. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018;48(1):3–7. - PubMed
-
- Hopp C., Hoover G.A. What crisis? Management researchers' experiences with and views of scholarly misconduct. Sci Eng Ethics. 2019;25(5):1549–1588. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
